Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flag channels by type #109

Open
mld18 opened this issue May 27, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Flag channels by type #109

mld18 opened this issue May 27, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@mld18
Copy link

mld18 commented May 27, 2017

Rocket.Chat Version: 0.55.1
Running Instances: 1
DB Replicaset OpLog: Disabled
Node Version: v4.2.6

We need a way to distinguish certain types of channels. Ideally, the users have a clear visual distinction in the channel list.

In our case we would like to flag channels that are supervised. This is important for chat at organizational scale. This way users know whether they can formally address topics or the channel is just for a casual chat with colleagues.

My idea would be to allow for the definition of channel tags/flags. The tags/flags could have a custom CSS class assigned. In the channel list Rocket can attach the respective CSS class to the elements that wrap the channel names. In the header section of the channel view the tags/flags may be shown with shortnames similar to the tags in GitHub.

Example for styling based on custom channel CSS class (#feedback is the distinguished channel in this example):
image

@mld18
Copy link
Author

mld18 commented May 29, 2017

This one relates to #2049. The resolution of #2049 would probably solve this issue to a great extend. Well, except for the posibility of a distinguished visual styling.

@rodrigok rodrigok assigned thiagosanchz and unassigned karlprieb Jan 10, 2019
@RocketChat RocketChat deleted a comment from GENSUSAN May 9, 2019
@marceloschmidt marceloschmidt transferred this issue from RocketChat/Rocket.Chat May 9, 2019
@marceloschmidt
Copy link
Member

Relatable: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat#658

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants