Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 29, 2023. It is now read-only.

Don't create enums for union types #966

Closed
lars-reimann opened this issue Jul 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #970
Closed

Don't create enums for union types #966

lars-reimann opened this issue Jul 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #970
Assignees
Labels
bug 🪲 Something isn't working released Included in a release

Comments

@lars-reimann
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Currently, we explicitly create enums for union types. This is always a false positive until we implement the @type annotation (see #875).

Desired solution

Don't create an enum annotation in this case for now.

Possible alternatives (optional)

No response

Screenshots (optional)

No response

Additional Context (optional)

No response

@lars-reimann lars-reimann added the enhancement 💡 New feature or request label Jul 9, 2022
@lars-reimann lars-reimann self-assigned this Jul 9, 2022
@lars-reimann lars-reimann added bug 🪲 Something isn't working and removed enhancement 💡 New feature or request labels Jul 9, 2022
@lars-reimann lars-reimann linked a pull request Jul 9, 2022 that will close this issue
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 9, 2022

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.57.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot added the released Included in a release label Jul 9, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug 🪲 Something isn't working released Included in a release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant