perf: improve performance of model & forward layer #616
Conversation
…olumns => 0 rows
Co-authored-by: WinPlay02 <[email protected]>
sibre28
changed the title
🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports MegaLinter is graciously provided by |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #616 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 61 62 +1
Lines 4609 4634 +25
=========================================
+ Hits 4609 4634 +25 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
lars-reimann
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a friendly reminder (as I do not know about the planing in the Library group): Please add __hash__, __eq__ and __sizeof__ implementations where possible (as they are really valuable for running the library with the memoization infrastructure provided by the runner)
E.g. for FNNLayer, input_size and output_size could be used to construct a hash
Nothing of this needs to happen in this PR, this is just a reminder
|
I just wanna start a discussion here, so mby we should start an extra discssion thread. Should there be an abstract Layer class, which contains all signatures of the Layer class, so the User gets better Feedback on the function calls. Aswell I question myself, do we want the user to change the activation function by himself?, or do we keep only internal handle. |
…able_dataset' into 610-improve-fnn-layer-and-model-performance-and-remove-some-bugs # Conflicts: # src/safeds/data/tabular/containers/_tagged_table.py # src/safeds/ml/nn/_model.py
…performance-and-remove-some-bugs' into 610-improve-fnn-layer-and-model-performance-and-remove-some-bugs
…performance-and-remove-some-bugs' into 610-improve-fnn-layer-and-model-performance-and-remove-some-bugs # Conflicts: # src/safeds/ml/nn/_model.py
…performance-and-remove-some-bugs' into 610-improve-fnn-layer-and-model-performance-and-remove-some-bugs # Conflicts: # src/safeds/ml/nn/_model.py
…and-remove-some-bugs
Marsmaennchen221
changed the title
Marsmaennchen221
deleted the
610-improve-fnn-layer-and-model-performance-and-remove-some-bugs
branch
## [0.21.0](v0.20.0...v0.21.0) (2024-04-17) ### Features * add ARIMA model ([#577](#577)) ([8b9c7a9](8b9c7a9)), closes [#570](#570) * Add ImageList class ([#534](#534)) ([3cb74a2](3cb74a2)), closes [#528](#528) [#599](#599) [#600](#600) * more hash, sizeof and eq implementations ([#609](#609)) ([2bc0b0a](2bc0b0a)) ### Performance Improvements * Add special case to `Table.add_rows` to increase performance ([#608](#608)) ([ffb8304](ffb8304)), closes [#606](#606) * improve performance of model & forward layer ([#616](#616)) ([e856cd5](e856cd5)), closes [#610](#610) * lazily import our modules and external libraries ([#624](#624)) ([20fc313](20fc313)) * treat Tables specially when calling add_rows ([#606](#606)) ([e555b85](e555b85)), closes [#575](#575)
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 0.21.0 🎉 The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
|
@Safe-DS/library For future PRs, please separate renamings of public API elements from internal changes. One is a minor version bump (later even a major version bump once we have a 1.x.x release), the other is a patch version bump. |
Closes #610
Summary of Changes
Fixed some bugs and improved the performance of some methods, there are still some changes to be made but it is helpful to merge this now as @Marsmaennchen221 and @Gerhardsa0 partly depend on it