DRAFT: jpegli support #204
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for contributing! This cli tool is intended as an full alternative to Squoosh Cli, so I plan to continue supporting mozjpeg. This new codec looks promising, so make it a separate subcommand. Also add a separate feature for this codec to improve modularity. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an initial draft of adding jpegli encoding support to replace the existing mozjpeg functionality.
jpegli seems to show significant improvements over mozjpeg.
I had a stab at adding jpegli decoding (which would theoretically enable 10-bit in JPEG for high quality images) but I didn't manage to get it working initially.
If there is interest in taking this PR forward I'd be happy to improve testing, and tidy it up further.