Skip to content

SaltyAom/bun-http-framework-benchmark

Repository files navigation

Bun HTTP Framework Benchmark

Compare throughput benchmarks from various JavaScript HTTP framework

Test method: Average throughput

  1. Ping
    • Request to [GET] /
    • Return hi
    • Headers must contains text Content-Type: text/plain, additional context is acceptable eg. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
  2. Query
    • Request to [GET] /id/:id
    • Extract path parameter, query string and setting headers.
    • For this benchmark, the request URL will be send as: /id/1?name=bun
    • Headers must contains x-powered-by to benchmark
    • Expected response: "1 bun" (${id} ${query})
      • You MUST NOT use hardcode string or index to extract querystring.
      • In a real-world situation, there's no enforcement that the request will follow the specification, using hardcode index to extract name=bun querystring will be prone to error.
      • To test if it pass the requirement, the implementation should be able to extract querystring dynamically (please treat the value of 'name=bun' can be any value beside 'bun', for example 'alice', 'hina'), which means that the same code should be able to extract querystring, for example:
      • /id/1?name=bun&id=1 -> should return 1 bun not 1 bun&id=1
      • /id/1?id=1 -> should return 1
      • Query beside name maybe not need to be extracted and is optional
    • Headers must contains text Content-Type: text/plain, additional context is acceptable eg. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
  3. Body
    • [POST] /json
    • Mirror body to response
    • Server MUST parse body to JSON and serialize back to string
    • For the benchmark, the request body will be sent as: { "hello": "world" }
    • Expected response: { "hello": "world" }
    • Headers must contains text Content-Type: application/json, additional context is acceptable eg. Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8.

requirement

  • The framework must at-least has latest published in less than 9 month otherwise will be classified as unmaintained and removed unless is an industry standard (Express).

Prerequistes

Run Test

bun benchmark

Dump result will be available at results/[benchmark-name].txt

Benchmark Condition

This benchmark is tested under the following condition:

  • Intel I7-13700K, DDR5 32GB 5600MHz
  • Arch Linux 6.10.8-arch1-1 (btw I use Arch)
  • Bun 1.1.28
  • Node 22.8.0
  • Deno 1.46.3

Tested on 5 Oct 2024 00:09 (GMT+7)

Results

These results are measured in req/s:

Framework Runtime Average Ping Query Body
uws node 528,684.53 536,296.26 509,781.41 539,975.92
bun bun 426,285.053 541,510.17 331,586.31 405,758.68
elysia bun 406,326.537 545,894.48 310,270.41 362,814.72
vixeny bun 354,580.23 381,762.05 314,406.56 367,572.08
hyper-express node 317,704.793 371,038.78 301,766.56 280,309.04
bun-web-standard bun 314,410.07 347,743.33 267,826.28 327,660.6
wobe bun 312,452.617 300,366.34 289,926.1 347,065.41
nhttp bun 290,448.297 384,062.91 254,244.8 233,037.18
hono bun 259,099.337 304,903.55 236,445.31 235,949.15
nbit bun 238,633.17 260,697.47 205,658.76 249,543.28
ultimate-express node 231,722.167 250,621.6 227,913.38 216,631.52
hono deno 207,349.25 257,259.12 201,391.88 163,396.75
fastify node 141,333.26 154,062.24 146,389.2 123,548.34
hono node 125,582.653 140,759.1 129,002.21 106,986.65
oak bun 124,979.077 122,740.6 114,019.91 138,176.72
express bun 122,036.157 134,268.59 115,736.47 116,103.41
h3 bun 120,694.673 145,834.79 117,195.34 99,053.89
oak deno 102,183.087 107,925.73 95,539.57 103,083.96
koa node 101,016.99 110,073.21 99,761.97 93,215.79
h3 node 99,490.347 132,280.52 113,216.61 52,973.91
acorn deno 62,980.927 92,288.31 68,977.54 27,676.93
express node 29,693.997 31,018.75 29,730.42 28,332.82
Crash: Nitro

See more detail in results

Notice

I highly recommended testing this benchmark on your machine yourself as performance in likely to vary between machine.

About

Compare throughput benchmark from various Bun HTTP framework

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published