Integrate JuliaSimCompiler

[xtalax]

No description provided.

[ai-maintainer]

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Integrate JuliaSimCompiler

Title and Description ❌

Title and Description Need Improvement

The title and description of the pull request are not sufficient. They do not provide enough context or information about the purpose and motivation behind the changes. It would be beneficial for the contributor to provide a more descriptive title and a detailed description that explains the purpose and motivation behind the integration of JuliaSimCompiler.

Scope of Changes ✅

Changes are Narrowly Focused

The changes in the pull request appear to be narrowly focused on integrating JuliaSimCompiler. The modifications primarily consist of changes to the `Project.toml` file, the addition of a new module `MethodOfLinesJuliaSimCompilerExt`, and some import statements in test files. These changes are all related to incorporating JuliaSimCompiler into the existing codebase.

Documentation ❌

Missing Docstrings

There are two newly added functions that do not have docstrings:

1. MethodOfLinesJuliaSimCompilerExt.add_metadata!
2. MethodOfLinesJuliaSimCompilerExt.generate_system

It is recommended to add docstrings to these functions to improve code readability and maintainability. The docstrings should explain the purpose of the function, the arguments it takes, and the expected behavior.

Testing ❌

No Information on Testing

The description of the pull request does not mention anything about how the author tested the changes. It is important for the author to provide information about the testing process they followed to ensure the correctness and functionality of the integrated JuliaSimCompiler.

Suggested Changes

1. Please provide a more descriptive title and a detailed description for the pull request.
2. Add docstrings to the newly added functions MethodOfLinesJuliaSimCompilerExt.add_metadata! and MethodOfLinesJuliaSimCompilerExt.generate_system.
3. Include information about how the changes were tested in the pull request description.

Potential Issues

No potential issues were identified in the code changes. However, without information on how the changes were tested, it's difficult to assess the potential impact of these changes on the existing codebase.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #298 (d88bf45) into master (6eb2984) will decrease coverage by 2.06%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 8.69%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #298      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.17%   84.11%   -2.06%     
==========================================
  Files          38       39       +1     
  Lines        1721     1763      +42     
==========================================
  Hits         1483     1483              
- Misses        238      280      +42     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...SimCompilerExt/MethodOfLinesJuliaSimCompilerExt.jl	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/MethodOfLines.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/MOL_discretization.jl	60.56% <100.00%> (ø)
...ization/schemes/function_scheme/function_scheme.jl	73.68% <100.00%> (ø)
src/interface/MOLFiniteDifference.jl	90.90% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[xtalax]

@thazhemadam the integration test is just exiting by the looks of things, bad config?

[thazhemadam]

@xtalax That's the fail-fast configuration specified for the workflow kicking in.
The job itself is failing because the PR was opened from a fork and GitHub doesn't provide access to GitHub secrets for CI jobs running on PRs opened from forks (for security reasons), as a result of which the job can't pick up the required secrets.

[xtalax]

@thazhemadam good to know, does that mean we're good to merge? Other fails are timeouts.

[thazhemadam]

@xtalax yes