Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update to mtk v9 #380

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024
Merged

update to mtk v9 #380

merged 22 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

xtalax
Copy link
Member

@xtalax xtalax commented Mar 11, 2024

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

Comment on lines 129 to 132
<<<<<<< HEAD
- Allen L J S, Bolker B M, Lou Y, et al. Asymptotic profiles of the steady states for an SIS epidemic reaction-diffusion model[J]. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 21(1): 1.
=======
- Allen L J S, Bolker B M, Lou Y, et al. Asymptotic profiles of the steady unknowns for an SIS epidemic reaction-diffusion model[J]. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 21(1): 1.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merge issue 😅

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.73%. Comparing base (113becf) to head (8d7c922).

❗ Current head 8d7c922 differs from pull request most recent head ee9c62a. Consider uploading reports for the commit ee9c62a to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
src/interface/solution/timedep.jl 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/MOL_discretization.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/discretization/staggered_discretize.jl 94.73% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #380      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.28%   79.73%   -5.55%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        1991     1979      -12     
==========================================
- Hits         1698     1578     -120     
- Misses        293      401     +108     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any issues, just the one question

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
using MethodOfLines, ModelingToolkit, LinearAlgebra, Test, OrdinaryDiffEq, DomainSets

@testset "Test 00: Test simple integration case (0 .. x), no transformation" begin
@test_broken begin #@testset "Test 00: Test simple integration case (0 .. x), no transformation" begin
# test integrals
@parameters t, x
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

MTK has it's own t definitions now. Do we want to use those with MOL?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can i still merge this?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since it's in tests it's not the end of the world, but using ModelingToolkit.t_nounits (or one of the unitful ones) is what we want to try and enforce with MTKv9 now

@xtalax xtalax merged commit ccd4c78 into SciML:master Mar 28, 2024
2 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants