-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update to mtk v9 #380
update to mtk v9 #380
Conversation
docs/src/tutorials/sispde.md
Outdated
<<<<<<< HEAD | ||
- Allen L J S, Bolker B M, Lou Y, et al. Asymptotic profiles of the steady states for an SIS epidemic reaction-diffusion model[J]. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 21(1): 1. | ||
======= | ||
- Allen L J S, Bolker B M, Lou Y, et al. Asymptotic profiles of the steady unknowns for an SIS epidemic reaction-diffusion model[J]. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2008, 21(1): 1. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Merge issue 😅
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #380 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.28% 79.73% -5.55%
==========================================
Files 41 41
Lines 1991 1979 -12
==========================================
- Hits 1698 1578 -120
- Misses 293 401 +108 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any issues, just the one question
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
using MethodOfLines, ModelingToolkit, LinearAlgebra, Test, OrdinaryDiffEq, DomainSets | |||
|
|||
@testset "Test 00: Test simple integration case (0 .. x), no transformation" begin | |||
@test_broken begin #@testset "Test 00: Test simple integration case (0 .. x), no transformation" begin | |||
# test integrals | |||
@parameters t, x |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
MTK has it's own t
definitions now. Do we want to use those with MOL?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can i still merge this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since it's in tests it's not the end of the world, but using ModelingToolkit.t_nounits
(or one of the unitful ones) is what we want to try and enforce with MTKv9 now
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.