-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 361
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Oblique Mercator class #2096
Oblique Mercator class #2096
Conversation
|
I think setting more appropriate values for |
Thanks @dopplershift, we did some experiments but the limits made no difference to the overlapping coastlines. Reasonably happy with the current iteration, having solved both confusions. |
@SciTools/cartopy-devs any ideas what I've done to cause the docs failure? |
@trexfeathers I think it wasn’t you pydata/pydata-sphinx-theme#1226 |
✔ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@trexfeathers Thanks for this awesome contribution, much appreciated.
Just some super minor comments to service, and then we can bank this new CRS loveliness 😄
@trexfeathers Thanks again... now it's time to oblique my mercator! Lovely contribution, cheers 🍻 |
|
Forgot to say: thanks to @ESadek-MO and @scottrobinson02 for their help on this project ❤ |
Rationale
Iris users are requesting (SciTools/iris#4830) support for the Oblique Mercator projection, in line with the CF Conventions. This will allow them to quickly and easily plot data from NetCDF files that use this projection.
(Code largely copied from
TransverseMercator
, with appropriate modifications).Implications
New feature, no other expected implications. Closes #1618.
To-do:
docs/source/reference/projections.rst
(Oblique Mercator class #2096 (comment))
x_limits
andy_limits
settings are appropriate(Oblique Mercator class #2096 (comment))
Usage example