-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 549
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to 1.21 #4248
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update to 1.21 #4248
Conversation
Pro Tip!
If your changes do not fall into any of these categories, don't worry. You can just ignore this message in that case! 👀 |
Slimefun preview buildA Slimefun preview build is available for testing! https://preview-builds.walshy.dev/download/Slimefun/4248/99cdc018
|
a5de53e
to
9f175bf
Compare
This still needs major testing |
41f9139
to
afaf3aa
Compare
afaf3aa
to
c84e876
Compare
ItemStack item = new CustomItemStack(Material.BEACON, "&cItem Test"); | ||
String id = "IS_ITEM_TEST"; | ||
SlimefunItem sfItem = TestUtilities.mockSlimefunItem(plugin, id, item); | ||
SlimefunItem sfItem = TestUtilities.mockSlimefunItem(plugin, id, new CustomItemStack(Material.BEACON, "&cItem Test")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the point of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think its testing that SlimefunItem#register
should change the underlying ItemStack
in some way, thus sfItem#isItem
should return false even if the twoItemStack
s were the same when we started.
testing produced multiple errors immediately which stopped any further testing. I've linked them from the contributors channel on discord. https://discord.com/channels/565557184348422174/565570276038017044/1290525215461216266 |
…istener to use the wrapper on Player#getOpenInventory
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Is there 1.21 build available? where? ty mate |
no. this is the work being done to get 1.21 up and running. |
when will 1.21 version come out? |
when all the changes that mojang and paper put in place are addressed and fixed. feel free to help |
lets try to keep comments not related to the PR on Discord please |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Please stop posting anything here, we already know what we need to fix it just requires time and patience and lots of changes, also you will not recive support for your own fork of the plugin. |
Do we ever plan on updating this? Or are we just going to let minecraft continue to update and abandon this project |
@JustinDevB Please do not add noisy comments to this PR, thank you. Questions go on Discord only. |
All that happens there is people get warned or muted for asking about the progress. Seems to be a topic nobody is allowed to discuss anywhere. |
can confirm, i was banned for no reason (i don't even talk there) |
Look, it's not fork(and it's |
Co-authored-by: Daniel Walsh <[email protected]>
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Description
Updates to 1.21 - big shout out to MockBukkit team and @Intybyte for the work on tests
Proposed changes
Updated Slimefun code to support 1.21
Related Issues (if applicable)
N/A
Checklist
Nonnull
andNullable
annotations to my methods to indicate their behaviour for null values