Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose functions previously in R/sysdata.rda #59

Closed
stufield opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #60
Closed

Expose functions previously in R/sysdata.rda #59

stufield opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #60

Comments

@stufield
Copy link
Contributor

  • once upon a time we wanted to hid these as internal functions
  • there is no good reason to keep doing this
  • move externals and allow full public access to internal code
stufield added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2023
- removing the internal sysdata.rda object
  and replacing those functions with actual `R/*.R` files
- there is no need to keep these internal functions hidden
- newly exported functions:
  - `addAttributes()`
  - `addClass()`
  - `cleanNames()`
  - `getAdatVersion()`
- new internal functions:
  - `convertColMeta()`
  - `genRowNames()`
  - `syncColMeta()`
  - `parseCheck()`
  - `scaleAnalytes()`
- `Makefile` no longer has recipe for generating sysdata.rda
- minor tweaks to some unit tests during porting over from
  internal code base
- fixes #59
stufield added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2023
- removing the internal sysdata.rda object
  and replacing those functions with actual `R/*.R` files
- there is no need to keep these internal functions hidden
- newly exported functions:
  - `addAttributes()`
  - `addClass()`
  - `cleanNames()`
  - `getAdatVersion()`
- new internal functions:
  - `convertColMeta()`
  - `genRowNames()`
  - `syncColMeta()`
  - `parseCheck()`
  - `scaleAnalytes()`
- `Makefile` no longer has recipe for generating sysdata.rda
- minor tweaks to some unit tests during porting over from
  internal code base
- fixes #59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant