Skip to content

How static are the parameters for a tool? #7

Answered by TimHHH
abhi18av asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hey @abhi18av
The COVERAGE_CAP and COUNT_UNPAIRED parameters are very unlikely to change in the future, the first just has to be very high to ensure that all coverage is counted and the second ensures that we do get coverage values even if we are using single read samples. The READ_LENGTH value could potentially be extracted from the sequence read data, but this is not a priority as the most important wgs stats are still calculated appropriately despite this value.
You are welcome to add these to a parameter variable though, because it may be interesting for other bacterial species, but I wouldn't want them to 'bloat' the default user interface.

Replies: 2 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@abhi18av
Comment options

abhi18av Oct 11, 2021
Maintainer Author

Answer selected by abhi18av
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants