Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New htaccess.txt is too complicated #220

Closed
instantflorian opened this issue Feb 20, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

New htaccess.txt is too complicated #220

instantflorian opened this issue Feb 20, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@instantflorian
Copy link
Contributor

instantflorian commented Feb 20, 2017

Do we really need this monster-htaccess? The .htaccess of WBCE 1.1 has only a bunch of lines and IT WORKS out of the box when renamed. The new one does not, there are duplicated lines and even removing the # in front of them make not the htaccess work properly, i.e. to force www in url.

So I guess we should roll back to the htaccess from 1.1.

@cwsoft
Copy link
Contributor

cwsoft commented Feb 25, 2017

Proposal: ship two htaccess files.
htaccess_light.txt: bare minimum to get short.php running nothing else
htaccess_full.txt: all the fancy stuff you can do with htaccess incl. documentation.ä

@instantflorian
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@NorHei
Copy link
Contributor

NorHei commented Feb 27, 2017

Maybe i schould habe a word whith Ruud about this ?

As i never used this module ..

@cwsoft
Copy link
Contributor

cwsoft commented Feb 28, 2017

@NorHei: Yes, please contact Ruud so we can move on with this issue.

@cwsoft
Copy link
Contributor

cwsoft commented Mar 12, 2017

Anbei mal eine leicht modifizierte .htaccess. Basiert auf WBCE 1.1.11 und wurde um ein paar Kommentare und Ergänzung für google_sitemap.php angereichert.
htaccess_light.txt

@cwsoft cwsoft removed the bug label Mar 14, 2017
@cwsoft cwsoft closed this as completed Apr 9, 2017
@cwsoft cwsoft modified the milestones: 1.2.0, 2.0.0-dev May 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants