Retiro_code

[Rominaleticiaburgos]

ATTENTION: ERC-RELATED PULL REQUESTS NOW OCCUR IN ETHEREUM/ERCS

--

When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-template.md

We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met:

• The PR edits only existing draft PRs.
• The build passes.
• Your GitHub username or email address is listed in the 'author' header of all affected PRs, inside .
• If matching on email address, the email address is the one publicly listed on your GitHub profile.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 07bee04

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[codeautopilot]

PR summary

The Pull Request titled "Retiro_code" seems to be related to the Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) repository, but it is important to note that the PR description indicates that ERC-related PRs should be made in a different repository (ETHEREUM/ERCS). The PR includes two main changes:

1. A new changeset file is added, indicating a patch update for a package with a placeholder name "@fake-scope/fake-pkg".
2. An edit to the .github/workflows/codeql.yml file, removing the fail-fast strategy from the CodeQL GitHub Actions workflow.

The implications of this PR are minimal as the changes seem to be either administrative or for demonstration purposes (given the placeholder names). The impact is likely limited to the workflow of the repository's CI/CD process and does not affect the Ethereum protocol or any ERC directly.

Suggestion

Given the placeholder nature of the package name in the changeset, it is important to ensure that the changes are intended for the actual repository and are not just for demonstration or testing purposes. If this is a legitimate update, the package name should be replaced with the correct one.

Additionally, the removal of the fail-fast strategy in the workflow file should be justified. The fail-fast option, when set to false, allows the CI/CD process to continue running even if one of the jobs fails. This can be useful for identifying multiple issues across different jobs in a single run. If this behavior is not desired, the change is fine, but it should be clear why this strategy is being changed.

Lastly, if this PR is not meant for the EIPs repository, it should be closed and reopened in the correct repository as indicated by the PR description.

Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect.

Current plan usage: 0.85%

Have feedback or need help?
Discord
Documentation
[email protected]