Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Puppeteer to the latest version #14986

Closed
wants to merge 17 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

gziolo
Copy link
Member

@gziolo gziolo commented Apr 15, 2019

Description

Upgrades puppeteer and related dependencies jest-puppeteer and expect-puppeteer to the latest versions.

This is necessary to let Firefox folks to run our e2e tests with Firefox browser, see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1539202 for more details :)

As of today, Gutenberg uses Puppeteer v1.6.1 which uses Chromium 69.0.3494.0 (r575458). This PR updates Puppeteer to v1.17.0 which uses Chromium 76.0.3803.0 (r662092). It's worth emphasizing that we officially support only 2 latest versions of Chrome.

Disabled tests

I will add a more detailed list later...

Testing

npm run test-e2e locally and on Travis

@gziolo gziolo added [Status] In Progress Tracking issues with work in progress [Type] Automated Testing Testing infrastructure changes impacting the execution of end-to-end (E2E) and/or unit tests. labels Apr 15, 2019
@gziolo gziolo self-assigned this Apr 15, 2019
@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 15, 2019

This is all failures I see on my local env:

Summary of all failing tests
 FAIL  specs/links.test.js (33.098s)
  ● Links › link popover remains visible after a mouse drag event

    expect(received).toHaveLength(expected)

    Expected length: 1
    Received length: 0
    Received array:  []

      476 |             // The link popover should still be visible
      477 |             const popover = await page.$$( '.block-editor-url-popover' );
    > 478 |             expect( popover ).toHaveLength( 1 );
          |                               ^
      479 |     } );
      480 | 
      481 |     it( 'should contain a label when it should open in a new tab', async () => {

      at Object.toHaveLength (specs/links.test.js:478:21)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/links.test.js:15:103)
      at _next (specs/links.test.js:17:194)

 FAIL  specs/preview.test.js (10.067s)
  ● Preview › should open a preview window for a new post

    Error: failed to find element matching selector ".entry-title"



      at ElementHandle.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/JSHandle.js:418:13)
        -- ASYNC --
      at ElementHandle.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:110:27)
      at DOMWorld.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/DOMWorld.js:149:21)
        -- ASYNC --
      at Frame.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:110:27)
      at Page.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/Page.js:329:29)
      at Page.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:111:23)
      at Object._callee2$ (specs/preview.test.js:301:32)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/preview.test.js:31:103)
      at _next (specs/preview.test.js:33:194)

  ● Preview › should not revert title during a preview right after a save draft

    Error: failed to find element matching selector ".entry-title"



      at ElementHandle.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/JSHandle.js:418:13)
        -- ASYNC --
      at ElementHandle.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:110:27)
      at DOMWorld.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/DOMWorld.js:149:21)
        -- ASYNC --
      at Frame.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:110:27)
      at Page.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/Page.js:329:29)
      at Page.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:111:23)
      at Object._callee3$ (specs/preview.test.js:458:32)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/preview.test.js:31:103)
      at _next (specs/preview.test.js:33:194)

  ● Preview with Custom Fields enabled › displays edits to the post title and content in the preview

    Error: failed to find element matching selector ".entry-title"



      at ElementHandle.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/JSHandle.js:418:13)
        -- ASYNC --
      at ElementHandle.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:110:27)
      at DOMWorld.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/DOMWorld.js:149:21)
        -- ASYNC --
      at Frame.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:110:27)
      at Page.$eval (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/Page.js:329:29)
      at Page.<anonymous> (../../node_modules/puppeteer/lib/helper.js:111:23)
      at Object._callee6$ (specs/preview.test.js:619:32)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/preview.test.js:31:103)
      at _next (specs/preview.test.js:33:194)

 FAIL  specs/demo.test.js
  ● new editor state › content should load without making the post dirty

    expect(jest.fn()).not.toHaveErrored(expected)

    Expected mock function not to be called but it was called with:
    ["Unhandled error"],["TypeError: Cannot read property 'replace' of undefined
        at replace (/Users/gziolo/PhpstormProjects/gutenberg/packages/e2e-tests/specs/demo.test.js:20:50)
        at Object.responseObjectTransform (/Users/gziolo/PhpstormProjects/gutenberg/packages/e2e-test-utils/build/mocks/@wordpress/e2e-test-utils/src/mocks/mock-or-transform.js:38:38)
        at tryCatch (/Users/gziolo/PhpstormProjects/gutenberg/node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
        at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (/Users/gziolo/PhpstormProjects/gutenberg/node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
        at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (/Users/gziolo/PhpstormProjects/gutenberg/node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
        at asyncGeneratorStep (/Users/gziolo/PhpstormProjects/gutenberg/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/asyncToGenerator.js:3:24)
        at _next (/Users/gziolo/PhpstormProjects/gutenberg/node_modules/@babel/runtime/helpers/asyncToGenerator.js:25:9)
        at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:68:7)"]

      at expect (../jest-console/build/@wordpress/jest-console/src/index.js:34:4)

 FAIL  specs/undo.test.js (5.679s)
  ● undo › Should undo to expected level intervals

    expect(received).not.toBeNull()

    Received: null

      62 |              expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toBe( '' );
      63 |              // After undoing every action, there should be no more undo history.
    > 64 |              expect( await page.$( '.editor-history__undo[aria-disabled="true"]' ) ).not.toBeNull();
         |                                                                                          ^
      65 |      } );
      66 | } );
      67 | 

      at Object.toBeNull (specs/undo.test.js:64:79)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/undo.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/undo.test.js:11:194)


Test Suites: 4 failed, 66 passed, 70 total
Tests:       6 failed, 4 skipped, 371 passed, 381 total
Snapshots:   252 passed, 252 total
Time:        555.843s
Ran all test suites.

@talldan
Copy link
Contributor

talldan commented Apr 16, 2019

Did some debugging on the failure of Links › link popover remains visible after a mouse drag event.

For some reason, in this version of Chromium, the link popover's container is narrower with its content overflowing. When the test performs the drag event, it is actually clicking outside of the popover because of the size issue, which results in dismissal of the popover:
Screen Shot 2019-04-16 at 1 03 31 pm

I wonder if this is actually a bug in this version of chromium (75.0.3738.0). I downloaded a later version (75.0.3768.0) and checked manually and the popover is normally sized.

(Conjecture) It could be that the test failures are related to the version of chromium more so than the puppeteer api. I noticed that the old version of puppeteer we were using was downloading chromium revision r575458, while the upgraded version downloads r641577.

@talldan
Copy link
Contributor

talldan commented Apr 16, 2019

I just tried it out in Puppeteer 1.12.2, which uses an earlier revision of chromium and that link test passes ok.

I also had a look at Preview › should open a preview window for a new post. This is also a strange issue. The second time the preview button is clicked, the preview tab becomes active and the editor tab closes. Not entirely sure why it closes.

I've pushed 5e0a0e7 to fix some of the preview tests.

I noticed #14994 which causes one of the other preview tests to fail, but seems like a genuine issue that we should fix separately.

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 16, 2019

I've pushed 5e0a0e7 to fix some of the preview tests.

Many thanks for submitting the fix 👍

I'm also surprised seeing that there are more test failures with popular plugins enabled 🤷‍♂️

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 23, 2019

FAIL specs/demo.test.js

This test should be fixed with c66f67f.

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 24, 2019

I disabled WP Editor Meta Boxes test suite in 4cfb304. It should be further investigated separately as it seems to be fragile on its own.

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 27, 2019

I'm down to 2 failures locally:

Summary of all failing tests
 FAIL  specs/links.test.js (24.435s)
  ● Links › link popover remains visible after a mouse drag event

    expect(received).toHaveLength(expected)

    Expected length: 1
    Received length: 0
    Received array:  []

      478 |             // The link popover should still be visible
      479 |             const popover = await page.$$( '.block-editor-url-popover' );
    > 480 |             expect( popover ).toHaveLength( 1 );
          |                               ^
      481 |     } );
      482 | 
      483 |     it( 'should contain a label when it should open in a new tab', async () => {

      at Object.toHaveLength (specs/links.test.js:480:21)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/links.test.js:15:103)
      at _next (specs/links.test.js:17:194)

 FAIL  specs/rich-text.test.js (11.192s)
  ● RichText › should apply formatting with access shortcut

    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()

    Snapshot name: `RichText should apply formatting with access shortcut 1`

    - Snapshot
    + Received

      "<!-- wp:paragraph -->
    - <p><s>test</s></p>
    + <p>test</p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->"

      34 |              await pressKeyWithModifier( 'access', 'd' );
      35 | 
    > 36 |              expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
         |                                                     ^
      37 |      } );
      38 | 
      39 |      it( 'should apply formatting with primary shortcut', async () => {

      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/rich-text.test.js:36:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/rich-text.test.js:11:103)
      at _next (specs/rich-text.test.js:13:194)

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 27, 2019

I fixed the rich text test in e1334f0 and Puppeteer upgrade dbc196f resolved the other failure. However, there is another test with 2 failing snapshots which need to be investigated.

 FAIL  specs/writing-flow.test.js (17.96s)
  ● adding blocks › should navigate around nested inline boundaries

    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()

    Snapshot name: `adding blocks should navigate around nested inline boundaries 1`

    - Snapshot
    + Received

      "<!-- wp:paragraph -->
    - <p><strong><em>1</em> <em>2</em></strong></p>
    + <p><strong>1 <em>2</em></strong></p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->"

      148 |             await page.keyboard.press( 'ArrowLeft' );
      149 | 
    > 150 |             expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
          |                                                    ^
      151 | 
      152 |             await page.keyboard.type( 'a' );
      153 |             await page.keyboard.press( 'ArrowRight' );

      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/writing-flow.test.js:150:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/writing-flow.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/writing-flow.test.js:11:194)

  ● adding blocks › should navigate around nested inline boundaries

    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()

    Snapshot name: `adding blocks should navigate around nested inline boundaries 2`

    - Snapshot
    + Received

      "<!-- wp:paragraph -->
    - <p>a<strong>b<em>c1d</em>e f<em>g2h</em>i</strong>j</p>
    + <p><strong><em>a</em>b1c d<em>e2f</em>g</strong>hij</p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->"

      170 |             await page.keyboard.type( 'j' );
      171 | 
    > 172 |             expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
          |                                                    ^
      173 |     } );
      174 | 
      175 |     it( 'should insert line break at end', async () => {

      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/writing-flow.test.js:172:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/writing-flow.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/writing-flow.test.js:11:194)

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 29, 2019

There are still some random failures on Travis.

https://travis-ci.com/WordPress/gutenberg/jobs/196309131#L1085
https://travis-ci.com/WordPress/gutenberg/jobs/196309136#L1084

 FAIL  specs/writing-flow.test.js (17.96s)
● adding blocks › should navigate around inline boundaries
    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()
    Snapshot name: `adding blocks should navigate around inline boundaries 1`
    - Snapshot
    + Received
      "<!-- wp:paragraph -->
      <p>FirstAfter</p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->
      
      <!-- wp:paragraph -->
    - <p>Before<strong>InsideSecondInside</strong>After</p>
    + <p>BeforeInsideSecondInsideAfter</p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->
      
      <!-- wp:paragraph -->
      <p>BeforeThird</p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->"
      129 | 		await page.keyboard.type( 'Before' );
      130 | 
    > 131 | 		expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
          | 		                                       ^
      132 | 	} );
      133 | 
      134 | 	it( 'should navigate around nested inline boundaries', async () => {
      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/writing-flow.test.js:131:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/writing-flow.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/writing-flow.test.js:11:194)
  ● adding blocks › should navigate around nested inline boundaries
    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()
    Snapshot name: `adding blocks should navigate around nested inline boundaries 1`
    - Snapshot
    + Received
      "<!-- wp:paragraph -->
    - <p><strong><em>1</em> <em>2</em></strong></p>
    + <p><strong><em>1</em> 2</strong></p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->"
      148 | 		await page.keyboard.press( 'ArrowLeft' );
      149 | 
    > 150 | 		expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
          | 		                                       ^
      151 | 
      152 | 		await page.keyboard.type( 'a' );
      153 | 		await page.keyboard.press( 'ArrowRight' );
      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/writing-flow.test.js:150:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/writing-flow.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/writing-flow.test.js:11:194)
  ● adding blocks › should navigate around nested inline boundaries
    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()
    Snapshot name: `adding blocks should navigate around nested inline boundaries 2`
    - Snapshot
    + Received
      "<!-- wp:paragraph -->
    - <p>a<strong>b<em>c1d</em>e f<em>g2h</em>i</strong>j</p>
    + <p>a<strong>b<em>c1d</em>e f2g</strong>hij</p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph -->"
      170 | 		await page.keyboard.type( 'j' );
      171 | 
    > 172 | 		expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
          | 		                                       ^
      173 | 	} );
      174 | 
      175 | 	it( 'should insert line break at end', async () => {
      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/writing-flow.test.js:172:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/writing-flow.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/writing-flow.test.js:11:194)

https://travis-ci.com/WordPress/gutenberg/jobs/196309137#L1083

 ● List › should outdent with children
    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()
    Snapshot name: `List should outdent with children 2`
    - Snapshot
    + Received
      "<!-- wp:list -->
    - <ul><li>a</li><li>b<ul><li>c</li></ul></li></ul>
    + <ul><li>a<ul><li>b</li><li>c</li></ul></li></ul>
      <!-- /wp:list -->"
      294 | 		await pressKeyWithModifier( 'primaryShift', 'm' );
      295 | 
    > 296 | 		expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
          | 		                                       ^
      297 | 	} );
      298 | 
      299 | 	it( 'should insert a line break on shift+enter', async () => {
      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/blocks/list.test.js:296:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/blocks/list.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/blocks/list.test.js:11:194)

@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 29, 2019

https://travis-ci.com/WordPress/gutenberg/jobs/196309137#L1114

FAIL packages/e2e-tests/specs/block-hierarchy-navigation.test.js (9.319s)
  ● Navigating the block hierarchy › should navigate block hierarchy using only the keyboard
    expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()
    Snapshot name: `Navigating the block hierarchy should navigate block hierarchy using only the keyboard 1`
    - Snapshot
    + Received
    - "<!-- wp:columns {"columns":3} -->
    - <div class="wp-block-columns has-3-columns"><!-- wp:column -->
    + "<!-- wp:columns -->
    + <div class="wp-block-columns has-2-columns"><!-- wp:column -->
      <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph -->
      <p>First column</p>
    + <!-- /wp:paragraph -->
    + 
    + <!-- wp:paragraph -->
    + <p></p>
      <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div>
      <!-- /wp:column -->
      
      <!-- wp:column -->
      <div class="wp-block-column"></div>
    - <!-- /wp:column -->
    - 
    - <!-- wp:column -->
    - <div class="wp-block-column"><!-- wp:paragraph -->
    - <p>Third column</p>
    - <!-- /wp:paragraph --></div>
      <!-- /wp:column --></div>
      <!-- /wp:columns -->"
      80 | 		await page.keyboard.type( 'Third column' );
      81 | 
    > 82 | 		expect( await getEditedPostContent() ).toMatchSnapshot();
         | 		                                       ^
      83 | 	} );
      84 | 
      85 | 	it( 'should appear and function even without nested blocks', async () => {
      at Object.toMatchSnapshot (specs/block-hierarchy-navigation.test.js:82:42)
      at tryCatch (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:62:40)
      at Generator.invoke [as _invoke] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:288:22)
      at Generator.prototype.(anonymous function) [as next] (../../node_modules/regenerator-runtime/runtime.js:114:21)
      at asyncGeneratorStep (specs/block-hierarchy-navigation.test.js:9:103)
      at _next (specs/block-hierarchy-navigation.test.js:11:194)

@gziolo gziolo added [Type] Task Issues or PRs that have been broken down into an individual action to take and removed [Status] In Progress Tracking issues with work in progress labels Apr 29, 2019
@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Apr 29, 2019

This is what I have locally when I run npm run test-e2e:

Test Suites: 1 skipped, 69 passed, 69 of 70 total
Tests:       10 skipped, 376 passed, 386 total
Snapshots:   251 passed, 251 total
Time:        572.662s
Ran all test suites.

There are still some tests failing on Travis. All of them around applying formats, so there might be some issue in Chrome 75. /cc @ellatrix

This is what I try now locally:

for i in {1..20}; do npx wp-scripts test-e2e --config packages/e2e-tests/jest.config.js packages/e2e-tests/specs/writing-flow.test.js; done;

It has failed 10 out of 20 times on one or both of the following tests:

  • should navigate around inline boundaries (2105ms)
  • should navigate around nested inline boundaries (1242ms)

@gziolo gziolo added the [Status] Blocked Used to indicate that a current effort isn't able to move forward label Jun 18, 2019
@gziolo
Copy link
Member Author

gziolo commented Aug 5, 2019

It looks like @ellatrix found a way to fix failing tests in #16875. We will close this PR as soon as the other one is ready to go 🎉

@gziolo gziolo added [Status] Duplicate Used to indicate that a current issue matches an existing one and can be closed and removed [Status] Blocked Used to indicate that a current effort isn't able to move forward labels Aug 6, 2019
@gziolo gziolo closed this in #16875 Aug 7, 2019
@gziolo gziolo deleted the update/puppeteer-bump branch August 7, 2019 06:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Status] Duplicate Used to indicate that a current issue matches an existing one and can be closed [Type] Automated Testing Testing infrastructure changes impacting the execution of end-to-end (E2E) and/or unit tests. [Type] Task Issues or PRs that have been broken down into an individual action to take
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants