Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fedx_codeowners_file #430

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sourcegraph-wk
Copy link

Adds a CODEOWNERS file to all of the repos officially owned by the fedx
Repo ownership was decided by repo:has.meta(team:fedx) so therefore transitively CID

Created by Sourcegraph batch change Workiva/fedx_codeowners_file.

@aviary-wf
Copy link

Security Insights

No security relevant content was detected by automated scans.

Action Items

  • Review PR for security impact; comment "security review required" if needed or unsure
  • Verify aviary.yaml coverage of security relevant code

Questions or Comments? Reach out on Slack: #support-infosec.

@matthewnitschke-wk matthewnitschke-wk marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2024 17:51
Copy link
Member

@robbecker-wf robbecker-wf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+10 @Workiva/release-management-p

@matthewnitschke-wk
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 @Workiva/release-management-p 🚢

1 similar comment
@matthewnitschke-wk
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 @Workiva/release-management-p 🚢

Copy link
Contributor

@rmconsole-wf rmconsole-wf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 from RM

@rmconsole7-wk rmconsole7-wk merged commit bb8b96f into master Aug 28, 2024
6 checks passed
@rmconsole7-wk rmconsole7-wk deleted the batch/fedx_codeowners_file/dart_dev branch August 28, 2024 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants