added default_type_to_object to default missing types to object #193
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@sjaensch any thoughts on this? I'd like to get this wrapped up so I can
release a new version and unblock some stuff I'm working on.
…On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:19 PM Coveralls ***@***.***> wrote:
[image: Coverage Status] <https://coveralls.io/builds/13157831>
Coverage increased (+0.006%) to 97.99% when pulling *fd7d8c1
<fd7d8c1>
on bplotnick:make-missing-type-behavior-configurable* into *29fcc1e
<29fcc1e>
on Yelp:master*.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#193 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFJH_QDCNotJU6s0NQawpY2E7Vmiz-Qsks5sf1KngaJpZM4PPAg3>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #183, we made it so that missing types will not be validated. This adds an option to validate missing types as objects.
Question: Do we want to have a third option that causes a hard failure when there is a missing type?
This addresses #192