-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance and create detailed documentation for scancode-config.yml #1197
Comments
We may want to also exclude certain package dependency scopes |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
#1204) Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
We may also want to include one or more fields to identify where SCIO should send notifications about the status of a project, including link(s) to the result files. working title of the new field could be |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
@pombredanne Could you enter a detailed issue about the implementation you have in mind, including concrete data examples? I have no clues about what is required here. |
Some notes:
|
For dependency scopes, I would like to be able to flag as ignored certain a dependency scopes of a given package type. For instance the config file could contain this:
These are actual scope names. There are no wildcards. Only exact matched strings The question is then to determine what we do with this:
2.) is solution that looks the cleanest and most obvious approach and is consistent with paths, also the fastest. |
* Enhance form help text for the scancode_license_score field #1197 Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]> * Enhance help text attribution_template and product name/version #1197 Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]> * Enhance help text for the ignored_patterns setting #1197 Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
…tion #1197 Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
see related issue: |
Which style/content should we adopt for such template? Here's a few ideas:
|
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
this is the best IMHO |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
) Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
We need to have detailed documentation for
scancode-config.yml
fields and syntax with concrete examples such we have a well-rounded and guided experience for users.We have no proper documentation for these fields:
Provide one or more path patterns to be ignored, one per line.
Do not return license matches with a score lower than this score. A number between 0 and 100.
Custom attribution template.
We need to also track some important data attributes to guide scanning and integration with other AboutCode tools:
As a nice to have we should also:
future (for reference only -- needs further evaluation):
specific list of package type/ecosystems in use including paths to the product package manifests and lockfiles as an alternative to aboutcode-org/dependency-inspector#2 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: