Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optionally scan package files too #83

Open
pombredanne opened this issue Feb 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Optionally scan package files too #83

pombredanne opened this issue Feb 4, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@pombredanne
Copy link
Member

pombredanne commented Feb 4, 2021

Files that are detected as part of a package are not further scanned in the default pipelines. We should have a few pipeline extras to allow optionally to:

  • lookup extra package data and file data externally (API calls to PurlDB)
  • scan files with scancode TK
  • fetch and scan corresponding source code with scancode TK (done to PurlDB)
AyanSinhaMahapatra added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
For rootfs pipelines (rootfs, docker, docker-windows) all package files
which were a part of system packages had their status updated and
consequently were not being scanned for licenses, copyrights, emails and
urls. We were also not scanning package metadata files tagged as application
packages in scan_codebase and the rootfs pipelines. This commit scans all
package files and package metadata files to make sure we are not missing
any information.

Reference: #762
Reference: #1194
Reference: #83
Signed-off-by: Ayan Sinha Mahapatra <[email protected]>
AyanSinhaMahapatra added a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
For rootfs pipelines (rootfs, docker, docker-windows) all package files
which were a part of system packages had their status updated and
consequently were not being scanned for licenses, copyrights, emails and
urls. We were also not scanning package metadata files tagged as application
packages in scan_codebase and the rootfs pipelines. This commit scans all
package files and package metadata files to make sure we are not missing
any information.

Reference: #762
Reference: #1194
Reference: #83
Signed-off-by: Ayan Sinha Mahapatra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant