We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If person X coauthors with person Y and X uses two name variants X1 and X2, then Y's name will appear twice in X's coauthor list (https://aclweb.org/anthology/people/i/ioannis-kakadiaris/)
Also, X will appear twice in Y's coauthor list, under two different names (https://aclweb.org/anthology/people/a/anastasia-krithara/)
Both of these are bugs, right? Should AnthologyIndex.coauthors use only canonical names (or unique IDs when we have them), not names?
AnthologyIndex.coauthors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Up to interpretation, I guess, but I do feel it would make more sense to use canonical names here, yes.
Sorry, something went wrong.
a226c21
If an author/editor has an explicit id in the XML, use it. (This invo…
9c5f165
…lved some reorganization of the data structures in AnthologyIndex.) acl-org#208, also fixes acl-org#305.
No branches or pull requests
If person X coauthors with person Y and X uses two name variants X1 and X2, then Y's name will appear twice in X's coauthor list (https://aclweb.org/anthology/people/i/ioannis-kakadiaris/)
Also, X will appear twice in Y's coauthor list, under two different names (https://aclweb.org/anthology/people/a/anastasia-krithara/)
Both of these are bugs, right? Should
AnthologyIndex.coauthors
use only canonical names (or unique IDs when we have them), not names?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: