Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixing my name in acl entry #3903

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Fixing my name in acl entry #3903

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion data/xml/2024.acl.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
<author><first>Elliot</first><last>Pickens</last><affiliation>Department of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin - Madison</affiliation></author>
<author><first>Coen</first><last>Needell</last></author>
<author><first>David</first><last>Rothschild</last><affiliation>Research, Microsoft</affiliation></author>
<author><first>Maria</first><last>Pacheco</last><affiliation>University of Colorado at Boulder</affiliation></author>
<author><first>Maria Leonor</first><last>Pacheco</last><affiliation>University of Colorado at Boulder</affiliation></author>
<pages>393-415</pages>
<abstract>The mainstream media has much leeway in what it chooses to cover and how it covers it. These choices have real-world consequences on what people know and their subsequent behaviors. However, the lack of objective measures to evaluate editorial choices makes research in this area particularly difficult. In this paper, we argue that there are newsworthy topics where objective measures exist in the form of supporting data and propose a computational framework to analyze editorial choices in this setup. We focus on the economy because the reporting of economic indicators presents us with a relatively easy way to determine both the selection and framing of various publications. Their values provide a ground truth of how the economy is doing relative to how the publications choose to cover it. To do this, we define frame prediction as a set of interdependent tasks. At the article level, we learn to identify the reported stance towards the general state of the economy. Then, for every numerical quantity reported in the article, we learn to identify whether it corresponds to an economic indicator and whether it is being reported in a positive or negative way. To perform our analysis, we track six American publishers and each article that appeared in the top 10 slots of their landing page between 2015 and 2023.</abstract>
<url hash="09aa02ed">2024.acl-long.24</url>
Expand Down
Loading