-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nrf52833 support #659
Nrf52833 support #659
Conversation
Signed-off-by: lawrence kincheloe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lawrence kincheloe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lawrence kincheloe <[email protected]>
# Conflicts: # boards.txt # variants/raytac_mdbt50q_rx/variant.h
…no.git into ada_master # Conflicts: # boards.txt # variants/raytac_mdbt50q_rx/variant.h Signed-off-by: lawrence kincheloe <[email protected]>
Sorry, I have been busy with other works, will review this whenever I could |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you make accidental changes to following, therefore please revert it
- submodule TinyUSB_Arduino
- submodule nRFcrypto
- changes to cpb nrf52840
I will review it more once #658 is merged, since it seems to have some conflict in platform.txt
#define PIN_A1 (15) | ||
#define PIN_A2 (16) | ||
#define PIN_A3 (17) | ||
#define PIN_A4 (18) | ||
#define PIN_A5 (19) | ||
#define PIN_A6 (20) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are you making these changes accidentally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I might have pulled those from another commit. I didn't intend to change those.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most of the modification looks good, though in additional to previous review, please
- clarify the Opossum Pouch and its vid/pid
- change generic board to pca10100
- remove the pca10059 (usb dongle) since the board requires soldering swd and flashing bootloader before actually using with this repo. Which is not really arduino friendly and could raise lots of support ticket from user.
|
||
|
||
# ---------------------------------- | ||
# Generic NRF52833 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
generic board is not accepted, this should be changed to pca10100 if that is what you mean.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's the intent. I was reworking another commit and missed the documentation name change.
op1.build.vid=0x239A | ||
op1.build.pid=0x8029 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you tell us more about this board. Also each board must has its own dedicated VID/PID and cannot re-use PID from another especially one is selling as commercial product.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a mistake, Opossum Pouch is the board that I'm developing. I've got it defined on a private fork.
* code flash 0x00000000 | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x26000, LENGTH = 0xED000 - 0x26000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be
FLASH (rx) : ORIGIN = 0x26000, LENGTH = 0x6D000 - 0x26000
0xED000 is too long
This PR would resolve #696 #696 was created in order to enable support of other nrf52833 boards in new tracking repo... @LokiMetaSmith I am planning to have a fork that will include many non-adafruit boards, including the 840 dongle. I have a "Community nRF52 Board Support package" but with all the changes that I made in it and those thatoccurred earlier this year in upstream, it's a bit of a mess especially that it's not set to track upstream. My new tracking fork isn't quite ready yet as I still have to get CI updated. |
52833 is supported by #739. Thank you for your patient |
adds nordic demo boards pca10059 and pca10100, also includes support for nrf52833