Skip to content

Apache Batik Server-Side Request Forgery

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 23, 2022 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Jan 8, 2024

Package

maven org.apache.xmlgraphics:batik (Maven)

Affected versions

>= 1.0, < 1.15

Patched versions

1.15

Description

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache XML Graphics Batik 1.14.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 22, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 23, 2022
Reviewed Sep 23, 2022
Last updated Jan 8, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.191%
(57th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-38398

GHSA ID

GHSA-c5xv-qc8p-mh2v

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.