Skip to content

jsoup may not sanitize code injection XSS attempts if SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks is enabled

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 24, 2022 in jhy/jsoup • Updated Feb 2, 2023

Package

maven org.jsoup:jsoup (Maven)

Affected versions

< 1.15.3

Patched versions

1.15.3

Description

jsoup may incorrectly sanitize HTML including javascript: URL expressions, which could allow cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks when a reader subsequently clicks that link. If the non-default SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks option is enabled, HTML including javascript: URLs that have been crafted with control characters will not be sanitized. If the site that this HTML is published on does not set a Content Security Policy, an XSS attack is then possible.

Impact

Sites that accept input HTML from users and use jsoup to sanitize that HTML, may be vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, if they have enabled SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks and do not set an appropriate Content Security Policy.

Patches

This issue is patched in jsoup 1.15.3.

Users should upgrade to this version. Additionally, as the unsanitized input may have been persisted, old content should be cleaned again using the updated version.

Workarounds

To remediate this issue without immediately upgrading:

  • disable SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks, which will rewrite input URLs as absolute URLs
  • ensure an appropriate Content Security Policy is defined. (This should be used regardless of upgrading, as a defence-in-depth best practice.)

Background and root cause

jsoup includes a Cleaner component, which is designed to sanitize input HTML against configurable safe-lists of acceptable tags, attributes, and attribute values.

This includes removing potentially malicious attributes such as <a href="javascript:...">, which may enable XSS attacks. It does this by validating URL attributes against allowed URL protocols (e.g. http, https).

However, an attacker may be able to bypass this check by embedding control characters into the href attribute value. This causes the Java URL class, which is used to resolve relative URLs to absolute URLs before checking the URL's protocol, to treat the URL as a relative URL. It is then resolved into an absolute URL with the configured base URI.

For example, java\tscript:... would resolve to https://example.com/java\tscript:....

By default, when using a safe-list that allows a tags, jsoup will rewrite any relative URLs (e.g. /foo/) to an absolute URL (e.g. https://example.com/foo/). Therefore, this attack attempt would be successfully mitigated. However, if the option SafeList.preserveRelativeLinks is enabled (which does not rewrite relative links to absolute), the input is left as-is.

While Java will treat a path like java\tscript: as a relative path, as it does not match the allowed characters of a URL spec, browsers may normalize out the control characters, and subsequently evaluate it as a javascript: spec inline expression. That disparity then leads to an XSS opportunity.

Sites defining a Content Security Policy that does not allow javascript expressions in link URLs will not be impacted, as the policy will prevent the script's execution.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Credits

Thanks to Jens Häderer, who reported this issue, and contributed to its resolution.

References

@jhy jhy published to jhy/jsoup Aug 24, 2022
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Aug 29, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 1, 2022
Reviewed Sep 1, 2022
Last updated Feb 2, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

0.111%
(46th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-36033

GHSA ID

GHSA-gp7f-rwcx-9369

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.