Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing ignite #354

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 5, 2019
Merged

Removing ignite #354

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 5, 2019

Conversation

zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Contributor

There have been lots of high-level libraries for PyTorch coming with time. Ignite is not the only one. I guess users of these libraries should create wrappers by themselves for these high-level libraries, instead of we maintaining these wrappers.

@zasdfgbnm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@farhadrgh Do you think it is OK to remove the cache-aev example? I also have a feeling that AEV caching should be implemented by the user, not inside TorchANI. I don't think it is easier for a user to learn our API than to write their own AEV cache.

@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
import os
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I already forget what this file is used for, but I don't think it is useful anymore.

Copy link
Member

@farhadrgh farhadrgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and, yes, cache_aev is better to be removed

@farhadrgh farhadrgh merged commit 123e476 into master Nov 5, 2019
@farhadrgh farhadrgh deleted the ignite branch November 5, 2019 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants