Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More comments #2630

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

More comments #2630

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

j0pgrm
Copy link

@j0pgrm j0pgrm commented Aug 17, 2022

Copy link
Collaborator

@ljharb ljharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The linked issue doesn't explain what it's about, and it's been closed. Can you elaborate on what you're trying to achieve?

@@ -73,6 +77,8 @@ Other Style Guides
- `symbol`
- `bigint`

*Goes over numbers*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems redundant

@@ -91,6 +97,8 @@ Other Style Guides
- `array`
- `function`

*Goes over arrays*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as does this

@@ -109,6 +117,8 @@ Other Style Guides

> Why? This ensures that you can’t reassign your references, which can lead to bugs and difficult to comprehend code.

*Vars and Consts*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and this

@@ -141,6 +151,8 @@ Other Style Guides
<a name="references--block-scope"></a><a name="2.3"></a>
- [2.3](#references--block-scope) Note that both `let` and `const` are block-scoped, whereas `var` is function-scoped.

*Goes over scopes in Javascript*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and this

@@ -162,6 +174,8 @@ Other Style Guides
<a name="objects--no-new"></a><a name="3.1"></a>
- [3.1](#objects--no-new) Use the literal syntax for object creation. eslint: [`no-new-object`](https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-new-object)

*Goes over objects*
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and this

Comment on lines -254 to +257
<Foo style={{ left: "20px" }} />
<Foo className='bad example' />

// good
<Foo style={{ left: '20px' }} />
<Foo className="good example" />
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these MUST remain as "style" with an object literal; there's nothing wrong with the current examples.

@ljharb ljharb marked this pull request as draft August 17, 2022 22:46
@ljharb ljharb mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants