Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Source Pinterest: enable SAT high strictness #21477

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2023

Conversation

arsenlosenko
Copy link
Contributor

What

Resoving:
#19059

How

Updating SAT config, adding expected records for one of the streams

Recommended reading order

  1. x.java
  2. y.python

🚨 User Impact 🚨

Are there any breaking changes? What is the end result perceived by the user? If yes, please merge this PR with the 🚨🚨 emoji so changelog authors can further highlight this if needed.

Pre-merge Checklist

Expand the relevant checklist and delete the others.

New Connector

Community member or Airbyter

  • Community member? Grant edit access to maintainers (instructions)
  • Secrets in the connector's spec are annotated with airbyte_secret
  • Unit & integration tests added and passing. Community members, please provide proof of success locally e.g: screenshot or copy-paste unit, integration, and acceptance test output. To run acceptance tests for a Python connector, follow instructions in the README. For java connectors run ./gradlew :airbyte-integrations:connectors:<name>:integrationTest.
  • Code reviews completed
  • Documentation updated
    • Connector's README.md
    • Connector's bootstrap.md. See description and examples
    • docs/integrations/<source or destination>/<name>.md including changelog. See changelog example
    • docs/integrations/README.md
    • airbyte-integrations/builds.md
  • PR name follows PR naming conventions

Airbyter

If this is a community PR, the Airbyte engineer reviewing this PR is responsible for the below items.

  • Create a non-forked branch based on this PR and test the below items on it
  • Build is successful
  • If new credentials are required for use in CI, add them to GSM. Instructions.
  • /test connector=connectors/<name> command is passing
  • New Connector version released on Dockerhub by running the /publish command described here
  • After the connector is published, connector added to connector index as described here
  • Seed specs have been re-generated by building the platform and committing the changes to the seed spec files, as described here
Updating a connector

Community member or Airbyter

  • Grant edit access to maintainers (instructions)
  • Secrets in the connector's spec are annotated with airbyte_secret
  • Unit & integration tests added and passing. Community members, please provide proof of success locally e.g: screenshot or copy-paste unit, integration, and acceptance test output. To run acceptance tests for a Python connector, follow instructions in the README. For java connectors run ./gradlew :airbyte-integrations:connectors:<name>:integrationTest.
  • Code reviews completed
  • Documentation updated
    • Connector's README.md
    • Connector's bootstrap.md. See description and examples
    • Changelog updated in docs/integrations/<source or destination>/<name>.md including changelog. See changelog example
  • PR name follows PR naming conventions

Airbyter

If this is a community PR, the Airbyte engineer reviewing this PR is responsible for the below items.

  • Create a non-forked branch based on this PR and test the below items on it
  • Build is successful
  • If new credentials are required for use in CI, add them to GSM. Instructions.
  • /test connector=connectors/<name> command is passing
  • New Connector version released on Dockerhub and connector version bumped by running the /publish command described here
Connector Generator
  • Issue acceptance criteria met
  • PR name follows PR naming conventions
  • If adding a new generator, add it to the list of scaffold modules being tested
  • The generator test modules (all connectors with -scaffold in their name) have been updated with the latest scaffold by running ./gradlew :airbyte-integrations:connector-templates:generator:testScaffoldTemplates then checking in your changes
  • Documentation which references the generator is updated as needed

Tests

Unit

Put your unit tests output here.

Integration

Put your integration tests output here.

Acceptance

Put your acceptance tests output here.

@arsenlosenko arsenlosenko self-assigned this Jan 17, 2023
@arsenlosenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

arsenlosenko commented Jan 17, 2023

/test connector=connectors/source-pinterest

🕑 connectors/source-pinterest https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/3938413742
✅ connectors/source-pinterest https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/3938413742
Python tests coverage:

Name                           Stmts   Miss  Cover
--------------------------------------------------
source_pinterest/utils.py          4      0   100%
source_pinterest/__init__.py       2      0   100%
source_pinterest/source.py       210     13    94%
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                            216     13    94%
	 Name                                                 Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
	 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 source_acceptance_test/base.py                          12      4    67%   16-19
	 source_acceptance_test/config.py                       141      5    96%   87, 93, 239, 243-244
	 source_acceptance_test/conftest.py                     211     95    55%   36, 42-44, 49, 54, 77, 83, 89-91, 110, 115-117, 123-125, 131-132, 137-138, 143, 149, 158-167, 173-178, 193, 217, 248, 254, 262-267, 275-285, 293-306, 311-317, 324-335, 342-358
	 source_acceptance_test/plugin.py                        69     25    64%   22-23, 31, 36, 120-140, 144-148
	 source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py              402    115    71%   53, 58, 93-104, 109-116, 120-121, 125-126, 308, 346-363, 376-387, 391-396, 402, 435-440, 478-485, 528-530, 533, 598-606, 618-621, 626, 682-683, 689, 692, 728-738, 751-776
	 source_acceptance_test/tests/test_incremental.py       160     14    91%   58-65, 70-83, 246
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/asserts.py                 39      2    95%   62-63
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/common.py                  94     10    89%   16-17, 32-38, 72, 75
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/compare.py                 62     23    63%   21-51, 68, 97-99
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/connector_runner.py       133     33    75%   24-27, 46-47, 50-54, 57-58, 73-75, 78-80, 83-85, 88-90, 93-95, 124-125, 159-161, 208
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/json_schema_helper.py     107     13    88%   30-31, 38, 41, 65-68, 96, 120, 192-194
	 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 TOTAL                                                 1609    339    79%

Build Passed

Test summary info:

=========================== short test summary info ============================
SKIPPED [1] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:94: The previous and actual specifications are identical.
SKIPPED [2] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:377: The previous and actual discovered catalogs are identical.
================== 38 passed, 3 skipped in 551.02s (0:09:11) ===================

Copy link
Contributor

@evantahler evantahler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

boards and board_pins seem like the main streams for Pintrest. Can some seed data be added to the sandbox?

Comment on lines +6 to +7
- bypass_reason: The stream could return 0 records, because of low rate-limits
name: ad_account_analytics
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain this a little more please? Rather than sleep to wait for more rate-limit, the source will give up and return 0 records?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, the rate limits for Pinterest API are quite low, and they are refreshed once a day, so that would be too long of a sleep for tests, that's why streams may return 0 records instead

@arsenlosenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

arsenlosenko commented Jan 18, 2023

/test connector=connectors/source-pinterest

🕑 connectors/source-pinterest https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/3947715149
✅ connectors/source-pinterest https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/actions/runs/3947715149
Python tests coverage:

Name                           Stmts   Miss  Cover
--------------------------------------------------
source_pinterest/utils.py          4      0   100%
source_pinterest/__init__.py       2      0   100%
source_pinterest/source.py       210     13    94%
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                            216     13    94%
	 Name                                                 Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
	 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 source_acceptance_test/base.py                          12      4    67%   16-19
	 source_acceptance_test/config.py                       141      5    96%   87, 93, 239, 243-244
	 source_acceptance_test/conftest.py                     211     95    55%   36, 42-44, 49, 54, 77, 83, 89-91, 110, 115-117, 123-125, 131-132, 137-138, 143, 149, 158-167, 173-178, 193, 217, 248, 254, 262-267, 275-285, 293-306, 311-317, 324-335, 342-358
	 source_acceptance_test/plugin.py                        69     25    64%   22-23, 31, 36, 120-140, 144-148
	 source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py              402    115    71%   53, 58, 93-104, 109-116, 120-121, 125-126, 308, 346-363, 376-387, 391-396, 402, 435-440, 478-485, 528-530, 533, 598-606, 618-621, 626, 682-683, 689, 692, 728-738, 751-776
	 source_acceptance_test/tests/test_incremental.py       160     14    91%   58-65, 70-83, 246
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/asserts.py                 39      2    95%   62-63
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/common.py                  94     10    89%   16-17, 32-38, 72, 75
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/compare.py                 62     23    63%   21-51, 68, 97-99
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/connector_runner.py       133     33    75%   24-27, 46-47, 50-54, 57-58, 73-75, 78-80, 83-85, 88-90, 93-95, 124-125, 159-161, 208
	 source_acceptance_test/utils/json_schema_helper.py     107     13    88%   30-31, 38, 41, 65-68, 96, 120, 192-194
	 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	 TOTAL                                                 1609    339    79%

Build Passed

Test summary info:

=========================== short test summary info ============================
SKIPPED [1] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:94: The previous and actual specifications are identical.
SKIPPED [2] ../usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/source_acceptance_test/tests/test_core.py:377: The previous and actual discovered catalogs are identical.
================== 38 passed, 3 skipped in 524.89s (0:08:44) ===================

@arsenlosenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

@evantahler I have added expected records for two streams you mentioned, you can continue your review 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@evantahler evantahler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@arsenlosenko arsenlosenko merged commit aa22a53 into master Jan 18, 2023
@arsenlosenko arsenlosenko deleted the arsenlosenko/source-pinterest-high-strictness branch January 18, 2023 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Source Pinterest: enable high test strictness level in SAT
6 participants