Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

just updating the unit testing file for Kafka Consumer #3834

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Nov 11, 2024

Description

just updating the unit testing file for Kafka Consumer

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced the test suite for the Kafka consumer to cover various scenarios.
    • Improved organization of stubbing for Kafka-related functions.
    • Expanded error handling tests for connection and message processing errors.
    • Ensured proper sequence of method calls and improved clarity in test structure.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve a comprehensive restructuring of the test suite for the Kafka consumer in ut_kafka-consumer.js. The modifications include consolidating individual stubs for Kafka functions into a single consumerStub object, enhancing the organization of the tests. The test cases have been updated to reflect this new structure, with expanded error handling scenarios and improved clarity and maintainability of the test suite.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/auth-service/bin/jobs/test/ut_kafka-consumer.js Restructured test suite; consolidated stubs into consumerStub; updated test cases for initialization, error handling, and message processing. Improved clarity and maintainability of tests.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update/kafka implementations #3753: This PR enhances error handling and message processing in the get_devices method, which is relevant to the Kafka consumer's functionality and error handling improvements in the main PR.
  • Update/kafka implementations #3784: This PR modifies the consume_from_topic method to improve the consumer's timeout settings and initialization logic, which aligns with the main PR's focus on enhancing the Kafka consumer's behavior and error handling.

Suggested reviewers

  • BenjaminSsempala
  • Psalmz777

In the land of Kafka, where messages flow,
Tests were restructured, to help them grow.
Stubs now united, in a single embrace,
Error handling expanded, keeping up the pace.
With clarity and order, the tests now shine bright,
Ensuring our consumer behaves just right! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.77%. Comparing base (cd62444) to head (769c27f).
Report is 4 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #3834   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.77%   11.77%           
========================================
  Files          114      114           
  Lines        15205    15205           
  Branches       274      274           
========================================
  Hits          1791     1791           
  Misses       13414    13414           

Copy link
Contributor

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit 96bf472 into staging Nov 11, 2024
50 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart deleted the hf-ut-kafka branch November 11, 2024 20:55
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4587bef and 769c27f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/auth-service/bin/jobs/test/ut_kafka-consumer.js (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/auth-service/bin/jobs/test/ut_kafka-consumer.js (2)

22-31: Well-structured stub initialization!

The consolidation of Kafka consumer stubs into a single consumerStub object is a great improvement. This approach:

  • Provides better organization of related stubs
  • Makes the test setup more maintainable
  • Accurately represents the actual Kafka consumer interface

129-146: Excellent subscription order verification!

This test effectively ensures the correct initialization sequence of the Kafka consumer by:

  • Verifying all topics are subscribed to before the consumer starts
  • Using Promise resolution to control the timing
  • Checking the correct order of operations

Comment on lines +67 to +81
it("should handle messages for each topic correctly", async () => {
// Simulate message processing by triggering the eachMessage callback
consumerStub.run.callsFake(async ({ eachMessage }) => {
await eachMessage({
topic: "ip-address",
partition: 0,
message: { value: JSON.stringify({ ip: "192.168.1.1" }) },
});
});

try {
// Call the kafkaConsumer function
await kafkaConsumer();
await kafkaConsumer();

// Check if the error is caught and logged
expect(
loggerErrorStub.calledOnceWithExactly(
"Error connecting to Kafka: Kafka connection error"
)
).to.be.true;
} catch (error) {
throw error;
}
// Verify message processing
expect(consumerStub.run.calledOnce).to.be.true;
// Add specific verification for your message handlers
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance message handling verification

While the test structure is good, it could benefit from more specific assertions to verify the actual message processing logic.

Consider adding these verifications:

 it("should handle messages for each topic correctly", async () => {
   // Simulate message processing by triggering the eachMessage callback
   consumerStub.run.callsFake(async ({ eachMessage }) => {
     await eachMessage({
       topic: "ip-address",
       partition: 0,
       message: { value: JSON.stringify({ ip: "192.168.1.1" }) },
     });
   });

   await kafkaConsumer();

   // Verify message processing
   expect(consumerStub.run.calledOnce).to.be.true;
+  // Verify the message was processed correctly
+  expect(loggerInfoStub.calledWith(
+    sinon.match(/Processing message from topic: ip-address/)
+  )).to.be.true;
+  // Verify any specific handlers or transformations
+  // Add assertions for business logic specific to ip-address topic
 });

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +97 to +108
it("should handle message processing errors", async () => {
consumerStub.run.callsFake(async ({ eachMessage }) => {
await eachMessage({
topic: "ip-address",
partition: 0,
message: {
value: "testMessageData",
},
};
await eachMessage(fakeMessage);
message: { value: "invalid-json" },
});
});

try {
// Call the kafkaConsumer function
await kafkaConsumer();
await kafkaConsumer();

// Check if the error is caught and logged
expect(
loggerErrorStub.calledOnceWithExactly(
"No operation defined for topic: topic2"
)
).to.be.true;
} catch (error) {
throw error;
}
expect(loggerErrorStub.called).to.be.true;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Strengthen error handling test assertions

The current test only verifies that an error was logged, but doesn't validate the specific error handling behavior.

Consider enhancing the test with more specific assertions:

 it("should handle message processing errors", async () => {
+  const invalidJson = "invalid-json";
   consumerStub.run.callsFake(async ({ eachMessage }) => {
     await eachMessage({
       topic: "ip-address",
       partition: 0,
-      message: { value: "invalid-json" },
+      message: { value: invalidJson },
     });
   });

   await kafkaConsumer();

-  expect(loggerErrorStub.called).to.be.true;
+  expect(loggerErrorStub.calledWith(
+    sinon.match(/Error processing message from topic: ip-address/)
+  )).to.be.true;
+  expect(jsonrepairStub.calledWith(invalidJson)).to.be.true;
+  // Verify that the consumer continues processing after error
+  expect(consumerStub.run.called).to.be.true;
 });

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant