codex: add initial testnet version #588
Conversation
vpavlin
changed the title
|
Tnx for PR @vpavlin ! |
|
Yeah, this is till a |
Hey @vpavlin ! |
codex/deploy.yml
Outdated
| --bootstrap-node=spr:CiUIAhIhAzZn3JmJab46BNjadVnLNQKbhnN3eYxwqpteKYY32SbOEgIDARo8CicAJQgCEiEDNmfcmYlpvjoE2Np1Wcs1ApuGc3d5jHCqm14phjfZJs4QrvWesAYaCwoJBKpA-TaRAnViKkcwRQIhANuMmZDD2c25xzTbKSirEpkZYoxbq-FU_lpI0K0e4mIVAiBfQX4yR47h1LCnHznXgDs6xx5DLO5q3lUcicqUeaqGeg \ | ||
| --bootstrap-node=spr:CiUIAhIhAgybmRwboqDdUJjeZrzh43sn5mp8jt6ENIb08tLn4x01EgIDARo8CicAJQgCEiECDJuZHBuioN1QmN5mvOHjeyfmanyO3oQ0hvTy0ufjHTUQh4ifsAYaCwoJBI_0zSiRAnVsKkcwRQIhAJCb_z0E3RsnQrEePdJzMSQrmn_ooHv6mbw1DOh5IbVNAiBbBJrWR8eBV6ftzMd6ofa5khNA2h88OBhMqHCIzSjCeA \ | ||
| --bootstrap-node=spr:CiUIAhIhAntGLadpfuBCD9XXfiN_43-V3L5VWgFCXxg4a8uhDdnYEgIDARo8CicAJQgCEiECe0Ytp2l-4EIP1dd-I3_jf5XcvlVaAUJfGDhry6EN2dgQsIufsAYaCwoJBNEmoCiRAnV2KkYwRAIgXO3bzd5VF8jLZG8r7dcLJ_FnQBYp1BcxrOvovEa40acCIDhQ14eJRoPwJ6GKgqOkXdaFAsoszl-HIRzYcXKeb7D9 \ | ||
| --storage-quota=11811160064 \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is 11Gib? Should this be configurable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is configurable, but you need to match the config option value and the storage request in the manifest
In theory, we could also automatically resolve the value from the mounted stored
Which would be probably best - we can do
df --output=size /codex | tail -1
And then all the deployer needs to do is to configure the storage request
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pused a commit with udpate
| @@ -330,6 +329,10 @@ Awesome DeFi apps you can deploy on Akash | |||
| - [TeamSpeak](teamspeak) | |||
| - [Waku](waku) | |||
|
|
|||
| ### Decentralized Storage | |||
| - [Codex](codex) | |||
| - [IPFS](ipfs) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd be a bit wary of bucketing IPFS and Codex together as they are very different, but OK I guess in this context it could be fine. They are both "decentralized storage" to some extent, just different guarantees and completely different modes of operation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Up to you, I created a new category here, if you feel like there is a better place among existing categories, I am open to suggestions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I guess I don't have good suggestions. We could say Codex is a DSN (Decentralized Storage Network) but that'd be an even more confusing term for someone who's just looking for storage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I'd leave it like this if @Dimokus88 is fine with it - worst case we restructure later.
| env: | ||
| - DATA_DIR=/codex/data | ||
| - PRIV_KEY= | ||
| - CODEX_NAT= |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With k8s, I believe you could do something like:
env:
- name: CODEX_NAT
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: status.hostIPnot sure this is possible here. I guess you'd know. 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is not, Akash is special - in this regard - we need to buy external IP and that is not propagated to the container in any way. There are some providers which are able to do this by using some particular netowrking setup/k8s plugins, but you cannot rely on it, so manual intervention is the best bet right now.
I have one idea I'd like to try to implement in Akash that would help, but I don't have time:D So I'd stick with manul copy for now
codex/deploy.yml
Outdated
| cpu: | ||
| units: 2 | ||
| memory: | ||
| size: 2Gi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No one is probably running it with this little RAM atm so I'm not sure this will always work, particularly with larger files. But we can always change it later. Caveat emptor. 😬
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I am fine bumping it, I probably just started from an existing deployment and never modified this
Co-authored-by: Giuliano Mega <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Giuliano Mega <[email protected]>
|
@Dimokus88 it is ready for your review:) |
|
Tnx @vpavlin ! |
|
Ready to merge @brewsterdrinkwater |
This PR adds Codex node deployment for Akash