feat: login with pair code #171
Conversation
feat(app): add LoginWithCode method to IAppService interface for handling phone number login feat(app): implement LoginWithCode method in App struct to handle phone number login logic feat(app): implement LoginWithCode method in serviceApp to pair phone number with WhatsApp client
WalkthroughThis update brings notable enhancements to the WhatsApp API MultiDevice application, primarily focusing on user authentication improvements. A new login method utilizing a pairing code has been added, enhancing usability. The API version has been updated, and various components and files have been modified to support the new functionality, including documentation, validation, and user interface elements. These changes aim to provide a more seamless user experience while ensuring dependencies are up-to-date. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AppLoginWithCode
participant Service
participant API
User->>AppLoginWithCode: Enter phone number
AppLoginWithCode->>Service: Validate phone number
Service->>API: Request login with code
API-->>Service: Return pair code
Service-->>AppLoginWithCode: Provide pair code
AppLoginWithCode-->>User: Display pair code
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
src/internal/rest/app.go (1)
17-17: Integration tests for the new endpoint are missing.The new endpoint
/app/login-with-codeis correctly added and documented. However, there are no integration tests covering this endpoint. Please ensure that integration tests are added to verify its functionality.
- File:
src/internal/rest/app.go- Endpoint:
/app/login-with-codeAnalysis chain
Ensure the new endpoint is documented and tested.
The new endpoint
/app/login-with-codeis correctly added. Ensure that it is properly documented in the API documentation and covered by integration tests.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new endpoint is documented and tested. # Test: Search for the endpoint documentation. Expect: Documentation for the new endpoint. rg --type markdown '/app/login-with-code' # Test: Search for the endpoint tests. Expect: Integration tests for the new endpoint. rg --type go 'app/login-with-code'Length of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new endpoint is covered by integration tests. # Test: Search for the endpoint tests in the test directory. Expect: Integration tests for the new endpoint. rg 'app/login-with-code' --type go --glob 'test/**'Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new endpoint is covered by integration tests. # Test: Search for the endpoint tests in all Go files. Expect: Integration tests for the new endpoint. rg 'app/login-with-code' --type goLength of output: 112
src/views/components/AppLogin.js (2)
Line range hint
25-27:
Ensure the API endpoint is correctly updated.The API endpoint should be updated to handle the new login method with a code.
- let response = await window.http.get(`/app/login`) + let response = await window.http.get(`/app/login-with-code?phone=${this.phoneNumber}`)
3-5: Ensure the new prop is documented and tested.The new prop
connectedis correctly added in the code, but it lacks proper documentation and unit tests. Please ensure that theconnectedprop is documented in the relevant component documentation and covered by unit tests.
- Documentation: Add details about the
connectedprop in the component's documentation.- Unit Tests: Add unit tests to cover the functionality related to the
connectedprop.Analysis chain
Ensure the new prop is documented and tested.
The new prop
connectedis correctly added. Ensure that it is properly documented in the component documentation and covered by unit tests.
Let's correct the command to search for the
connectedprop documentation and tests by specifying the correct file type or using a glob pattern.
To ensure that the
connectedprop is documented and tested, we need to search for relevant documentation files (like README.md, component documentation files) and test files (like files in atestsdirectory or files following a test naming convention).
Let's list the relevant files first and then search within them to ensure the
connectedprop is documented and tested.
Let's search for documentation in the
readme.mdfile and search for theconnectedprop in all JavaScript files to ensure we cover possible test files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new prop is documented and tested. # Test: Search for the prop documentation. Expect: Documentation for the new prop. rg --type javascript 'connected' # Test: Search for the prop tests. Expect: Unit tests for the new prop. rg --type javascript 'connected' --files-with-matches | xargs -I {} rg 'connected' {}Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new prop is documented and tested. # Test: Search for the prop documentation. Expect: Documentation for the new prop. rg --glob '*.js' 'connected' # Test: Search for the prop tests. Expect: Unit tests for the new prop. rg --glob '*.js' 'connected' --files-with-matches | xargs -I {} rg 'connected' {}Length of output: 779
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new prop is documented and tested. # Search for documentation in markdown files rg 'connected' --glob '*.md' # Search for test files that include the connected prop rg 'connected' --glob '*.{test,spec}.js'Length of output: 218
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new prop is documented and tested. # List markdown files echo "Markdown files:" fd --type f --extension md # List test files echo "Test files:" fd --type f --extension js --exec echo {} \; | grep -E '\.(test|spec)\.js$' # Search for documentation in markdown files echo "Searching for documentation in markdown files:" rg 'connected' --glob '*.md' # Search for test files that include the connected prop echo "Searching for tests in test files:" rg 'connected' --glob '*.{test,spec}.js'Length of output: 594
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new prop is documented and tested. # Search for documentation in the readme.md file echo "Searching for documentation in readme.md:" rg 'connected' readme.md # Search for the connected prop in all JavaScript files, including possible test files echo "Searching for tests and usage in JavaScript files:" rg 'connected' --glob '*.js'Length of output: 685
readme.md (1)
143-143: Reduce the number of exclamation marks.Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive. Consider reducing their usage.
- | Homepage |  | + | Homepage |  |Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~143-~143: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 26 exclamation marks for a text that’s 7858 characters long)
Context: ...---------------| | Homepage || | Login |
| | Login With Code |
| | Send Message |
| | Send Image |
| | Send File |
| | Send Video |
| | Send Contact |
| | Send Location |
| | Send Audio |
| | Send Poll |
| | Revoke Message |
| | Delete Message |
| | Reaction Message |
| | Edit Message |
| | User Info |
| | User Avatar |
| | My Privacy |
| | My Group |
| | Auto Reply |
| | Basic Auth Prompt |
| | Manage Participant | 
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (14)
- docker/golang.Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- docs/openapi.yaml (3 hunks)
- readme.md (2 hunks)
- src/config/settings.go (1 hunks)
- src/domains/app/app.go (1 hunks)
- src/go.mod (2 hunks)
- src/internal/rest/app.go (2 hunks)
- src/services/app.go (2 hunks)
- src/validations/app_validation.go (1 hunks)
- src/validations/app_validation_test.go (1 hunks)
- src/views/components/AppLogin.js (3 hunks)
- src/views/components/AppLoginWithCode.js (1 hunks)
- src/views/components/AppReconnect.js (1 hunks)
- src/views/index.html (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- src/config/settings.go
- src/go.mod
- src/views/components/AppReconnect.js
Additional context used
LanguageTool
readme.md
[style] ~143-~143: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 26 exclamation marks for a text that’s 7858 characters long)
Context: ...---------------| | Homepage |(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
Additional comments not posted (17)
docker/golang.Dockerfile (2)
4-4: Update to Go and Alpine versions.The base image for the builder has been updated to
golang:1.22.5-alpine3.20. This ensures that the application is built using the latest Go version and Alpine Linux version, which may include important security patches and performance improvements.
17-17: Update to Alpine version.The final image has been updated to
alpine:3.20. This ensures that the runtime environment benefits from the latest updates and security patches available in Alpine Linux.src/validations/app_validation.go (2)
1-9: Imports and package declaration.The necessary packages are imported for validation and error handling. The
ozzo-validationlibrary is used for validation, and a custom error package is used for error handling.
11-20: Validate phone number format.The function
ValidateLoginWithCodevalidates the phone number format using a regular expression. This ensures that the phone number is in a valid format before proceeding with the login process.src/domains/app/app.go (1)
10-10: Addition ofLoginWithCodemethod.The
LoginWithCodemethod has been added to theIAppServiceinterface. This method allows users to log in using a code sent to their phone, enhancing the authentication options available in the application.src/views/components/AppLoginWithCode.js (2)
6-15: Verify the necessity of jQuery.Consider using Vue's built-in methods or libraries instead of jQuery for better integration and maintainability.
Are you sure jQuery is necessary here? Vue provides ways to handle DOM manipulations that might be more appropriate.
17-22: LGTM!The data property is correctly defined.
src/services/app.go (2)
Line range hint
1-21:
LGTM!The imports are appropriate for the new method.
Line range hint
23-93:
LGTM!The existing code is unaffected by the new changes.
Also applies to: 112-197
src/views/index.html (3)
131-131: LGTM!The import statement for
AppLoginWithCodeis correct and necessary.
175-178: LGTM!The component registration for
AppLoginWithCodeis correct and necessary.
47-47: LGTM!The new component usage for
AppLoginWithCodeis correctly integrated.readme.md (2)
139-164: LGTM! Verify the accuracy of images and descriptions.The new "User Interface" section with updated images and descriptions enhances the documentation.
Ensure that the images and descriptions accurately reflect the application's features.
Tools
LanguageTool
[style] ~143-~143: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 26 exclamation marks for a text that’s 7858 characters long)
Context: ...---------------| | Homepage |(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
103-104: LGTM! Verify the new login method.The update to specify "Login with Scan QR" and the addition of "Login With Pair Code" improves clarity.
Ensure that the new login method is correctly implemented and documented in the codebase.
docs/openapi.yaml (3)
4-4: LGTM! Version update approved.The API version increment from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 is appropriate for the new features introduced.
1270-1284: LGTM! Verify the new response schema usage.The new response schema
LoginWithCodeResponseis well-defined.Ensure that the new response schema is correctly used in the codebase.
Verification successful
The
LoginWithCodeResponseschema is referenced correctly in thedocs/openapi.yamlfile. However, we need to verify the context in which it is used to ensure it is applied correctly in the API response definitions.
To ensure the correct usage of the
LoginWithCodeResponseschema, we need to identify the specific endpoints and response codes that utilize it.
To ensure the correct usage of the
LoginWithCodeResponseschema, we need to identify the specific endpoints and response codes that utilize it. Let's perform a search for all response schemas in thedocs/openapi.yamlfile to get a comprehensive view.
Usage of the new response schema is correct.
The
LoginWithCodeResponseschema is correctly used in the/app/login-with-codeendpoint for a200response.
/app/login-with-codeendpoint usesLoginWithCodeResponsefor a200response.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new response schema. # Test: Search for the usage of the new response schema. Expect: Correct usage of the new response schema. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'LoginWithCodeResponse'Length of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context of the usage of the new response schema. # Test: Search for the usage of the new response schema and include more context lines to understand its application. rg --type yaml -A 10 $'LoginWithCodeResponse'Length of output: 1006
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify specific endpoints and response codes using the new response schema. # Test: Search for the usage of the new response schema and include sufficient context lines to identify the endpoints and response codes. rg --type yaml -A 20 $'LoginWithCodeResponse'Length of output: 1852
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify all response schemas in the openapi.yaml file to understand the usage of LoginWithCodeResponse. # Test: Search for all response schemas in the openapi.yaml file. rg --type yaml -A 10 'schema:'Length of output: 41482
39-64: LGTM! Verify the new endpoint implementation.The new endpoint
/app/login-with-codeis well-documented with detailed specifications.Ensure that the new endpoint is correctly implemented in the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- src/pkg/error/app_error.go (1 hunks)
- src/services/app.go (2 hunks)
- src/validations/app_validation_test.go (1 hunks)
- src/views/components/AppLogin.js (3 hunks)
- src/views/components/AppLoginWithCode.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/pkg/error/app_error.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- src/services/app.go
- src/validations/app_validation_test.go
- src/views/components/AppLogin.js
- src/views/components/AppLoginWithCode.js
Context
Test Results