Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix #468 use the vatchecker library instead of using the lambda #461

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

fix #468 use the vatchecker library instead of using the lambda #461

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

syjer
Copy link
Member

@syjer syjer commented Jun 4, 2018 •
edited
Loading

I think it's complete now, can be merged.

Fix #468

@syjer syjer requested a review from cbellone June 4, 2018 15:15
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 4, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 51.319% when pulling 5b59a0a on switch-euvatchecker into 32dfe3d on master.

@syjer syjer changed the title use the vatchecker library instead of using the lambda fix #468 use the vatchecker library instead of using the lambda Jun 11, 2018
@syjer syjer added this to the 2.0-M0 milestone Jun 11, 2018
@syjer
Copy link
Member Author

syjer commented Jun 11, 2018

will be merged when the master will be ready for the 2.0M0 work (soon)

@syjer syjer mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2018
Closed
@syjer
Copy link
Member Author

syjer commented Jun 20, 2018

Will be replaced by a new PR.

@syjer syjer closed this Jun 20, 2018
@syjer syjer deleted the switch-euvatchecker branch June 20, 2018 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@cbellone cbellone Awaiting requested review from cbellone

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.0-M0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@syjer @coveralls