-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 473
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding new scenario for feature networks #3451
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
algojack
requested review from
onetechnical,
egieseke,
bricerisingalgorand and
algobarb
January 19, 2022 17:20
algojack
changed the title
Adding new recipe for feature networks
Adding new scenario for feature networks
Jan 19, 2022
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3451 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 47.64% 47.64%
=======================================
Files 370 370
Lines 59826 59826
=======================================
+ Hits 28502 28505 +3
+ Misses 28013 28008 -5
- Partials 3311 3313 +2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
onetechnical
previously approved these changes
Jan 21, 2022
algobarb
previously approved these changes
Jan 21, 2022
egieseke
previously approved these changes
Jan 21, 2022
algojack
dismissed stale reviews from egieseke, algobarb, and onetechnical
via
January 21, 2022 21:23
974c8f8
onetechnical
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2022
egieseke
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2022
jannotti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2022
* ledger: fix `NextRewardsState()` (#3403) ## Summary A modification of #3336. Added a new test where the rewards pool overspends and proposed a fix in `NextRewardsState()` requiring a consensus upgrade. ## Test Plan This is mostly tests. * Fix a potential problem of committing non-uniform consensus versions (#3453) If accountdb accumulates a large backlog, it is possible catchpoint tracker would attempt to commit a wider range than account updates tracker expects. * avoid generating log error on EnsureValidatedBlock / EnsureBlock (#3424) In EnsureBlock,, do not log as error message if the error is ledgercore.ErrNonSequentialBlockEval and the block round is in the past (i.e. already in the ledger). * Fix typo Fulll to Full (#3456) Fix typo * Fix worng message on restore crash db. (#3455) When crash state is found but could not be restored, noCrashState variable is used to report a warning. However, this variable was set to false in a case where there was no crash state, and the wrong warning was reported. * Adding new scenario for feature networks (#3451) Co-authored-by: Tolik Zinovyev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pavel Zbitskiy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Shant Karakashian <[email protected]>
jannotti
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2022
* ledger: fix `NextRewardsState()` (#3403) ## Summary A modification of #3336. Added a new test where the rewards pool overspends and proposed a fix in `NextRewardsState()` requiring a consensus upgrade. ## Test Plan This is mostly tests. * Fix a potential problem of committing non-uniform consensus versions (#3453) If accountdb accumulates a large backlog, it is possible catchpoint tracker would attempt to commit a wider range than account updates tracker expects. * avoid generating log error on EnsureValidatedBlock / EnsureBlock (#3424) In EnsureBlock,, do not log as error message if the error is ledgercore.ErrNonSequentialBlockEval and the block round is in the past (i.e. already in the ledger). * Fix typo Fulll to Full (#3456) Fix typo * Fix worng message on restore crash db. (#3455) When crash state is found but could not be restored, noCrashState variable is used to report a warning. However, this variable was set to false in a case where there was no crash state, and the wrong warning was reported. * Adding new scenario for feature networks (#3451) * Fixing telemetry ports (#3497) Co-authored-by: Tolik Zinovyev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pavel Zbitskiy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Shant Karakashian <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jack <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tested by using it.