Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account #3739

Merged
merged 71 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

algonautshant
Copy link
Contributor

@algonautshant algonautshant commented Mar 10, 2022

Solution

ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account
resolves https://github.com/algorand/go-algorand-internal/issues/1857

Testing

This is a test

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 10, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3739 (b12bb7e) into master (9b13756) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3739   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.66%   49.66%           
=======================================
  Files         392      392           
  Lines       68588    68590    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        34065    34068    +3     
- Misses      30780    30781    +1     
+ Partials     3743     3741    -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
node/node.go 23.26% <0.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
catchup/service.go 68.64% <0.00%> (-1.49%) ⬇️
cmd/tealdbg/debugger.go 71.42% <0.00%> (-0.99%) ⬇️
ledger/acctupdates.go 68.42% <0.00%> (-0.67%) ⬇️
network/requestTracker.go 70.68% <0.00%> (-0.44%) ⬇️
network/wsNetwork.go 62.99% <0.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️
catchup/peerSelector.go 100.00% <0.00%> (+1.04%) ⬆️
network/wsPeer.go 68.88% <0.00%> (+3.05%) ⬆️
cmd/algoh/blockWatcher.go 80.95% <0.00%> (+3.17%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9b13756...b12bb7e. Read the comment docs.

@algonautshant algonautshant changed the title ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account Tests: ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account Mar 10, 2022
@algonautshant algonautshant changed the title Tests: ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account New Feature: ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account Mar 10, 2022
@algobarb algobarb changed the title New Feature: ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account Mar 10, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@tsachiherman tsachiherman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in addition to the previous comments:
In test, we shouldn't use fmt.Printf. Instead, we should be using t.Log, or even better, logging.TestingLog.

@tsachiherman tsachiherman merged commit f8a869b into algorand:master Mar 11, 2022
jannotti pushed a commit to jannotti/go-algorand that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2022
## Solution 

ledger refactoring: test 6M assets/apps per account
resolves algorand/go-algorand-internal#1857


## Testing

This is a test
@algojack algojack mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants