Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

W-13739999 (fix): unnest unions in parsing. Didn't remove transformation step because it is still useful in some cases #1825

Merged

Conversation

tomsfernandez
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tomsfernandez tomsfernandez force-pushed the W-13739999/unnest-unions-in-resource-types-and-traits branch from 12fe02f to 21b1c64 Compare July 13, 2023 15:12
…ion step because it is still useful in some cases
@tomsfernandez tomsfernandez force-pushed the W-13739999/unnest-unions-in-resource-types-and-traits branch from 21b1c64 to b0fb763 Compare July 13, 2023 17:09
@nschejtman nschejtman merged commit 21d21ca into develop Jul 13, 2023
4 checks passed
@nschejtman nschejtman deleted the W-13739999/unnest-unions-in-resource-types-and-traits branch July 13, 2023 18:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants