-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 571
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add bash classifier #2055
feat: add bash classifier #2055
Conversation
Signed-off-by: witchcraze <[email protected]>
// @(#)Bash version 5.2.0(1) alpha GNU | ||
// @(#)Bash version 5.2.0(1) beta GNU | ||
// @(#)Bash version 5.2.0(1) rc4 GNU | ||
`(?m)@\(#\)Bash version (?P<version>[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\([0-9]\) [a-z0-9]+ GNU`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this regex need the end bits [a-z0-9]+ GNU
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the nice thing about having the suffix you highlighted is that it's more specific, which means we have less chance of matching something that is not bash. The possible downside is if there are other builds of bash that might not have this suffix. My vote is to leave it as specific as possible until we find evidence that we're missing other builds that don't have this suffix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for the contribution @witchcraze 👍
Signed-off-by: witchcraze <[email protected]>
This PR adds a binary cataloger for bash
Fixes #1963