Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI - 574 - Update codecov action to v4 #575

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
May 7, 2024
Merged

CI - 574 - Update codecov action to v4 #575

merged 14 commits into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

da1910
Copy link
Collaborator

@da1910 da1910 commented May 2, 2024

Closes #574

Update the action to get rid of the node version warning

@da1910 da1910 requested a review from Andy-Grigg May 2, 2024 15:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added the maintenance Package and maintenance related label May 2, 2024
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
CI - 574 - Update codecov action to v4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose we should add this directory to an exclusion? It's irritating, because in general it's good to spellcheck these things, but we don't want to be adding individual exemptions for individual packages.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I raised ansys/actions#477 - It's going to happen to everyone, we should do it centrally

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the approach for getting this PR merged then, are we blocked until that ticket is resolved?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A splendid question, we could update our exclusion regex, but I don't know if you can exclude based on paths, or only on filenames. I wonder what pyMapdl is doing

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we already have the Vale.Terms = No included?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I subsequently realised this, so I'm puzzled. Theres no exclusion in their pre-commit config file that I can see

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we just add codecov as an allowed word

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.25%. Comparing base (35df812) to head (0b01181).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #575   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.25%   94.25%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         783      783           
=======================================
  Hits          738      738           
  Misses         45       45           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 2, 2024
@da1910 da1910 enabled auto-merge May 3, 2024 09:43
Copy link
Contributor

@ludovicsteinbach ludovicsteinbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This relies on a branch in ansys/actions. Shouldn't we wait for a new release?

@da1910 da1910 disabled auto-merge May 3, 2024 10:05
@Andy-Grigg
Copy link
Contributor

This relies on a branch in ansys/actions. Shouldn't we wait for a new release?

I'd prefer to wait at least until the actions branch is merged into main, we can always point to a specific commit until a release is made if we want.

@da1910 da1910 added this pull request to the merge queue May 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit f9e2187 May 7, 2024
34 checks passed
@Andy-Grigg Andy-Grigg deleted the ci/codecov_4 branch May 7, 2024 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation maintenance Package and maintenance related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update codecov action to v4
6 participants