Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Import stackup from dictionary #3685

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Oct 2, 2023
Merged

Conversation

hui-zhou-a
Copy link
Contributor

Now stackup.load supports dictionary as input. The data format is the same as json stackup file.

Added default values to layer and material properties.

svandenb-dev and others added 29 commits June 29, 2023 16:06
# Conflicts:
#	pyaedt/edb_core/edb_data/primitives_data.py
@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@hui-zhou-a hui-zhou-a linked an issue Sep 30, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3685 (a002123) into main (554348c) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 87.75%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3685      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.96%   80.96%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         178      178              
  Lines       61595    61597       +2     
==========================================
  Hits        49872    49872              
- Misses      11723    11725       +2     

@svandenb-dev svandenb-dev merged commit 54ba50d into main Oct 2, 2023
11 checks passed
@svandenb-dev svandenb-dev deleted the import_stackup_from_dictionary branch October 2, 2023 09:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

load stackup from json is too demanding
2 participants