-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REFACTOR: Icepak Mesh class initialization performance #4877
Conversation
Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying: @ansys-reviewer-bot review |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4877 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.16% 83.18% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 118 118
Lines 54143 54140 -3
==========================================
+ Hits 45027 45036 +9
+ Misses 9116 9104 -12 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Look good
@SMoraisAnsys I excluded from test coverage the lines of code that are related to 23R2 and previous, but is seems that codecov is ignoring the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lorenzovecchietti It might be related with the extra space used to declare the code a not covered. Can you try the proposed changes ?
d90877d
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Morais <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Morais <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Close #4876
Big thanks to @Leunamedaking for the help in testing the changes.