Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

account for edge case with hidden nodes #755

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2021
Merged

Conversation

akaszynski
Copy link
Collaborator

@akaszynski akaszynski commented Dec 1, 2021

Resolves #751 by adding in an additional check within MeshGrpc to ensure that hidden nodes are not added to the internal mapdl.mesh.grid object when pulling the nodes from the server. For reference, these hidden nodes are created for BEAM188 elements when running SOLVE. Oddly enough, MAPDL will mention that these nodes exist in CDWRITE, but not actually write them, nor list them when running mapdl.nlist.


Bonus change

Our style check was running the spell check twice. This has been split up into two separate tasks, and the requirements are also installed in a previous step so it's easier to read the logs.

@akaszynski akaszynski added the Bug label Dec 1, 2021
@akaszynski akaszynski self-assigned this Dec 1, 2021
@akaszynski akaszynski changed the title deal with edge case with hidden nodes account for edge case with hidden nodes Dec 2, 2021
@akaszynski akaszynski merged commit 45be250 into main Dec 2, 2021
@akaszynski akaszynski deleted the fix/hidden_nodes branch December 2, 2021 02:54
akaszynski added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2021
akaszynski added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

mapdl.post_processing.plot_nodal_displacement() doesn't work with element Beam188
1 participant