-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump up portmap version to v0.8.7 #1534
Conversation
Thanks for your PR. The following commands are available:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1534 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.79% 67.65% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 169 169
Lines 13503 13503
==========================================
- Hits 9154 9136 -18
- Misses 3407 3420 +13
- Partials 942 947 +5
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
/test-all |
@antoninbas I haven't updated the base image, want the PR get reviewed first. If it gets approval, could you help update the image and merge it to catch 0.10.2? |
To fix a performance issue that portmap performs expensive iptables operations even no portMappings are configured.
/test-all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
To fix a performance issue that portmap performs expensive iptables operations even no portMappings are configured.
To fix a performance issue that portmap performs expensive iptables operations even no portMappings are configured.
To fix a performance issue that portmap performs expensive iptables
operations even no portMappings are configured.
Upstream fix: containernetworking/plugins@877602d
Fixes #1499