-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ignore Services of type ExternalName in NodePortLocal Controller #3114
Ignore Services of type ExternalName in NodePortLocal Controller #3114
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3114 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 59.81% 51.39% -8.43%
==========================================
Files 331 303 -28
Lines 28437 36350 +7913
==========================================
+ Hits 17010 18681 +1671
- Misses 9549 15881 +6332
+ Partials 1878 1788 -90
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
For ExternalName Services, the selector is meaningless and should be ignored. Before this patch, the NPL Controller would treat these Services in the same way as ClusterIP / LoadBalancer Services. Signed-off-by: Antonin Bas <[email protected]>
895d4cf
to
de2186c
Compare
/test-all |
/test-e2e |
Not backporting this unless there is a request to do so, as it is a very minor fix |
…rea-io#3114) For ExternalName Services, the selector is meaningless and should be ignored. Before this patch, the NPL Controller would treat these Services in the same way as ClusterIP / LoadBalancer Services. Signed-off-by: Antonin Bas <[email protected]>
For ExternalName Services, the selector is meaningless and should be
ignored. Before this patch, the NPL Controller would treat these
Services in the same way as ClusterIP / LoadBalancer Services.
Signed-off-by: Antonin Bas [email protected]