Ensure MTU is set correctly when WireGuard interface already exists #5926
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In ce46eb1 ("Fix incorrect MTU configurations"), we changed WireGuard interface's MTU in IPv4 case. However, if a cluster already enables WireGuard, the WireGuard interface's MTU would remain unchanged while new Pod would use a higher MTU, causing problems. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <[email protected]>
antoninbas
approved these changes
Jan 26, 2024
|
/skip-all |
tnqn
added a commit
to tnqn/antrea
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
…ntrea-io#5926) In ce46eb1 ("Fix incorrect MTU configurations"), we changed WireGuard interface's MTU in IPv4 case. However, if a cluster already enables WireGuard, the WireGuard interface's MTU would remain unchanged while new Pod would use a higher MTU, causing problems. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <[email protected]>
tnqn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
…5926) In ce46eb1 ("Fix incorrect MTU configurations"), we changed WireGuard interface's MTU in IPv4 case. However, if a cluster already enables WireGuard, the WireGuard interface's MTU would remain unchanged while new Pod would use a higher MTU, causing problems. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <[email protected]>
tnqn
added a commit
to tnqn/antrea
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
…ntrea-io#5926) In ce46eb1 ("Fix incorrect MTU configurations"), we changed WireGuard interface's MTU in IPv4 case. However, if a cluster already enables WireGuard, the WireGuard interface's MTU would remain unchanged while new Pod would use a higher MTU, causing problems. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <[email protected]>
tnqn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
…5926) In ce46eb1 ("Fix incorrect MTU configurations"), we changed WireGuard interface's MTU in IPv4 case. However, if a cluster already enables WireGuard, the WireGuard interface's MTU would remain unchanged while new Pod would use a higher MTU, causing problems. Signed-off-by: Quan Tian <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In ce46eb1 ("Fix incorrect MTU configurations"), we changed WireGuard interface's MTU in IPv4 case. However, if a cluster already enables WireGuard, the WireGuard interface's MTU would remain unchanged while new Pod would use a higher MTU, causing problems.