Docs: Fix FAQ on scheduler latency #13969
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also fix typo in the "promote new flags" output
kaxil
reviewed
Jan 29, 2021
kaxil
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2021
|
Thanks for the PR @jedcunningham |
kaxil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2021
(cherry picked from commit ddc4242)
kaxil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2021
(cherry picked from commit ddc4242)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
parsing_processesno longer has an impact on scheduler latency, so reword this section and point folks to running more than 1 scheduler.Also, fix typo in the "promote new flags" output.