Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Turn common.io xcom exception into OptionalProviderFeatureException #38543

Merged

Conversation

potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Mar 27, 2024

The common.io xcom exception should be Optional Provider Feature. When it's not, it's raising a compatiblity error when run on Airflow < 2.9.0.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

The common.io xcom exception should be Optional Provider Feature.
When it's not, it's raising a compatiblity error when run on Airflow
< 2.9.0.
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 2227414 into apache:main Mar 27, 2024
47 of 48 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the turn-xcom-exception-into-optional-feature-one branch March 27, 2024 20:16
mathiaHT pushed a commit to mathiaHT/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2024
…pache#38543)

The common.io xcom exception should be Optional Provider Feature.
When it's not, it's raising a compatiblity error when run on Airflow
< 2.9.0.
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
…pache#38543)

The common.io xcom exception should be Optional Provider Feature.
When it's not, it's raising a compatiblity error when run on Airflow
< 2.9.0.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants