Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AIRFLOW-5406] allow spark without kubernetes #6921

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2019
Merged

[AIRFLOW-5406] allow spark without kubernetes #6921

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 27, 2019

Conversation

tooptoop4
Copy link
Contributor

@tooptoop4 tooptoop4 commented Dec 27, 2019

Make sure you have checked all steps below.

Jira

  • My PR addresses the following Airflow Jira issues and references them in the PR title. For example, "[AIRFLOW-XXX] My Airflow PR"
    • https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-XXX
    • In case you are fixing a typo in the documentation you can prepend your commit with [AIRFLOW-XXX], code changes always need a Jira issue.
    • In case you are proposing a fundamental code change, you need to create an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP).
    • In case you are adding a dependency, check if the license complies with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.

Description

  • Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI changes:

Tests

  • My PR adds the following unit tests OR does not need testing for this extremely good reason:

Commits

  • My commits all reference Jira issues in their subject lines, and I have squashed multiple commits if they address the same issue. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "How to write a good git commit message":
    1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
    2. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
    3. Subject does not end with a period
    4. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
    5. Body wraps at 72 characters
    6. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"

Documentation

  • In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation that describes how to use it.
    • All the public functions and the classes in the PR contain docstrings that explain what it does
    • If you implement backwards incompatible changes, please leave a note in the Updating.md so we can assign it to a appropriate release

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 27, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6921 into master will decrease coverage by 0.47%.
The diff coverage is 50%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6921      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.72%   84.25%   -0.48%     
==========================================
  Files         679      679              
  Lines       38508    38514       +6     
==========================================
- Hits        32626    32450     -176     
- Misses       5882     6064     +182
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
airflow/contrib/hooks/spark_submit_hook.py 82.11% <50%> (-0.61%) ⬇️
airflow/models/__init__.py 91.3% <50%> (-8.7%) ⬇️
airflow/kubernetes/volume_mount.py 44.44% <0%> (-55.56%) ⬇️
airflow/kubernetes/volume.py 52.94% <0%> (-47.06%) ⬇️
airflow/kubernetes/pod_launcher.py 45.25% <0%> (-46.72%) ⬇️
airflow/executors/sequential_executor.py 56% <0%> (-32%) ⬇️
airflow/kubernetes/refresh_config.py 50.98% <0%> (-23.53%) ⬇️
...rflow/contrib/operators/kubernetes_pod_operator.py 78.75% <0%> (-20%) ⬇️
airflow/utils/dag_processing.py 80.95% <0%> (-7.05%) ⬇️
airflow/utils/sqlalchemy.py 89.83% <0%> (-6.78%) ⬇️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0205b74...fdc41fb. Read the comment docs.

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 56ed5fc into apache:master Dec 27, 2019
potiuk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2019
potiuk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2019
galuszkak pushed a commit to FlyrInc/apache-airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants