Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AIRFLOW-6381] Remove styling based on DAG id from DAGs page #6985

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2020
Merged

[AIRFLOW-6381] Remove styling based on DAG id from DAGs page #6985

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2020

Conversation

tigerjz32
Copy link
Contributor

@tigerjz32 tigerjz32 commented Jan 1, 2020

Issue link: AIRFLOW-6381

@tigerjz32 tigerjz32 changed the base branch from master to v1-10-test January 1, 2020 00:13
@mik-laj
Copy link
Member

mik-laj commented Jan 4, 2020

Something is wrong with this change. It contains a huge amount of commit. Can you fix it?

@kaxil kaxil changed the base branch from v1-10-test to master January 6, 2020 23:09
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:webserver Webserver related Issues label Jan 6, 2020
@kaxil
Copy link
Member

kaxil commented Jan 6, 2020

I have updated the base so should be fine now.

@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ <h2>DAGs</h2>

<!-- Column 4: Dag Schedule -->
<td>
<a class="label label-default schedule {{ dag.dag_id }}" href="{{ url_for('DagRunModelView.list') }}?_flt_3_dag_id={{ dag.dag_id }}">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mik-laj Do you know if we have custom CSS somewhere based on DAG ID

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't think we do as dag_id can be literally anything!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've seen it before, but I believed it had a purpose. :-D

Copy link
Member

@kaxil kaxil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tigerjz32 Thanks for raising this PR

@kaxil kaxil closed this Jan 6, 2020
@kaxil kaxil reopened this Jan 6, 2020
@kaxil
Copy link
Member

kaxil commented Jan 6, 2020

Waiting for the CI to pass before I merge

@tigerjz32
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @kaxil!

@kaxil kaxil merged commit 748e3c3 into apache:master Jan 7, 2020
@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Jan 7, 2020

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:webserver Webserver related Issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants