-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-37722: [Java][FlightRPC] Deprecate stateful login methods #37833
Conversation
|
@lidavidm Should I follow suit with the same on the Go side? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense to me, I think the same interfaces still exist on the Go and C++ implementations, so we probably want to update the documentation for both of them too
Yes, anything based on Handshake should not be preferred by new application code (it's probably just a footgun at best) |
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 64acef8. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. |
…pache#37833) ### Rationale for this change The existence of these interfaces confuses users and leads them to antipatterns. ### What changes are included in this PR? Deprecate (but not for removal) the old interfaces. ### Are these changes tested? N/A ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. * Closes: apache#37722 Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…pache#37833) ### Rationale for this change The existence of these interfaces confuses users and leads them to antipatterns. ### What changes are included in this PR? Deprecate (but not for removal) the old interfaces. ### Are these changes tested? N/A ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. * Closes: apache#37722 Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…pache#37833) ### Rationale for this change The existence of these interfaces confuses users and leads them to antipatterns. ### What changes are included in this PR? Deprecate (but not for removal) the old interfaces. ### Are these changes tested? N/A ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. * Closes: apache#37722 Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…pache#37833) ### Rationale for this change The existence of these interfaces confuses users and leads them to antipatterns. ### What changes are included in this PR? Deprecate (but not for removal) the old interfaces. ### Are these changes tested? N/A ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. * Closes: apache#37722 Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Rationale for this change
The existence of these interfaces confuses users and leads them to antipatterns.
What changes are included in this PR?
Deprecate (but not for removal) the old interfaces.
Are these changes tested?
N/A
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
adbc_driver_flightsql.connect
to Java Flight Server #37722