GH-41571: [Java] Revert GH-41307 (#41309) #41628
Conversation
|
|
github-actions
bot
added
Component: Java
awaiting committer review
|
@github-actions crossbow submit test--spark- java |
|
Revision: 8285a2b Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-a804e6c132
|
|
@danepitkin @vibhatha if the java-jars and spark jobs are this finicky, they really should be part of the regular CI and not Crossbow |
|
It also appears the C++ build broke again |
|
@lidavidm +1 to including java-jars with regular CIs. It has been failing for many cases very recently. |
|
@felipecrv have you come across this issue: https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/9054922130/job/24875318571#step:8:2503 |
|
@vibhatha I never seen it because I never build Gandiva. |
|
No review? I'm going to close this PR soon if it looks like we don't want it @vibhatha @danepitkin |
|
@lidavidm I will review this today. Shall we rebase since there were some changes in Java and CIs. |
| @@ -274,6 +288,7 @@ | |||
| <plugin> | |||
| <groupId>org.cyclonedx</groupId> | |||
| <artifactId>cyclonedx-maven-plugin</artifactId> | |||
| <version>2.7.11</version> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lidavidm just curious, I am comparing this PR agains: #41309.
And We the following dependency in the main
<plugin>
<groupId>org.cyclonedx</groupId>
<artifactId>cyclonedx-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.8.0</version>
</plugin>
And we had the following in the said PR.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.cyclonedx</groupId>
<artifactId>cyclonedx-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.7.11</version>
</plugin>
And in here we have 2.7.11, any specific reason we picked 2.7.11? not 2.8.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not particularly bothered so long as CI passes. We can let dependabot upgrade it again.
| @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ | |||
| <description>JMH Performance benchmarks for other Arrow libraries.</description> | |||
|
|
|||
| <properties> | |||
| <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here in the previous PR the following component has been removed, but we haven't reverted it back here.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration combine.self="override">
<compilerVersion>${javac.target}</compilerVersion>
<source>${javac.target}</source>
<target>${javac.target}</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
And in the main we have
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<annotationProcessorPaths combine.children="append">
<path>
<groupId>org.openjdk.jmh</groupId>
<artifactId>jmh-generator-annprocess</artifactId>
<version>${jmh.version}</version>
</path>
</annotationProcessorPaths>
</configuration>
</plugin>
So I hope this is okay?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not particularly bothered so long as CI passes.
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting changes
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g java |
|
Revision: 8285a2b Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4bdc9eb706
|
|
@lidavidm the java-jars CI failures are from a previously resolved issued. |
This reverts commit 9090e67.
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g java |
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting change review
|
Revision: 3c561a2 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-057b79da1a
|
|
Looks like Spark is fixed but Dataset is now broken. |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g java |
|
Revision: dd15529 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-a5a11e35cd
|
Yes, a test is failing. Let me check if it is failing in other PRs. |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
|
Revision: 290cdba Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-d1d168f413
|
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g java |
|
Revision: 290cdba Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-d90628c846
|
|
@lidavidm seems like java-jars is passing 🎉 |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit e3cd0ae. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 1 possible false positive for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
…1628) ### Rationale for this change The commit in question caused a lot of CI issues ### Are these changes tested? N/A ### Are there any user-facing changes? N/A * GitHub Issue: apache#41571 Authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Rationale for this change
The commit in question caused a lot of CI issues
Are these changes tested?
N/A
Are there any user-facing changes?
N/A