Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CELEBORN-1718] Fix memory storage file won't hard split when memory file is full and worker has no disks #2918

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

FMX
Copy link
Contributor

@FMX FMX commented Nov 14, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Return hard split if a memory storage file is full and the worker has no disks.

Why are the changes needed?

In current implementation, a task might be hang because the worker rejected the shuffle data and returned nothing.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

NO.

How was this patch tested?

GA.

Copy link
Contributor

@RexXiong RexXiong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@SteNicholas SteNicholas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Merged to main(v0.6.0) and branch-0.5(v0.5.3).

SteNicholas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
…file is full and worker has no disks

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Return hard split if a memory storage file is full and the worker has no disks.

### Why are the changes needed?
In current implementation, a task might be hang because the worker rejected the shuffle data and returned nothing.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO.

### How was this patch tested?
GA.

Closes #2918 from FMX/b1718.

Authored-by: mingji <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SteNicholas <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 11a4007)
Signed-off-by: SteNicholas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants