-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor: Ctrl+C Termination in CLI #8739
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like CTRL+C just getting out of the loop without actual query interruption?
So the machine resources is not released when the user tries to run next query after CTRL+C?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding was that when control arrives there, tasks were already interrupted. But I could be wrong -- in that case this PR needs to address your point
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this code is correct.
My understanding of what happens is that if the signal is handled, it will
drop
the future runningexec_and_print
which will implicitly isdrop
ed which should then propagate back and cancel outstanding tasksThere are a variety of tests that validate that outstanding tasks are cancelled when their containing streams are dropped such as https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/1179a76567892b259c88f08243ee01f05c4c3d5c/datafusion/physical-plan/src/coalesce_partitions.rs#L216-L234
If we find instances where dropping a stream doesn't cancel the ongoing execution, I think we should file that as a bug and fix it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 it might be good to add some documentation to the https://docs.rs/datafusion/latest/datafusion/physical_plan/trait.ExecutionPlan.html#tymethod.execute to explain the drop / cancel behavior and expectations this better. I will add that to my list
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is correct, too
Per tokio::select documentation:
This is also what I tried initially: #1279 (comment)
But I had the roadblock of
exec_and_print
being blocking at that time. That doesn't seem to be the case anymore so this should be good.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is a proposed PR with some clarifying documentation : #8747
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think @berkaysynnada / @ozankabak made the output mostly streaming in #8651