Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(polar): angleAxis extent when boundaryGap is false #20184

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ovilia
Copy link
Contributor

@Ovilia Ovilia commented Jul 22, 2024

Brief Information

This pull request is in the type of:

  • bug fixing
  • new feature
  • others

What does this PR do?

When angleAxis in the polar system has boundaryGap: false, the extent is adjusted since this commit so that polar bars don't overlap each other. The main idea is to make extra space according to data count. But it may overkill in some situations.

Fixed issues

NA.

This PR is not a fix to #20172 , which is not a bug.

Details

Before: What was the problem?

Consider the case when startAngle: 90, endAngle: -90, before this PR, it has the result of:

image

This is not as expected because a developer set startAngle: 90, endAngle: -90 would expect the range to be half a circle.

After: How does it behave after the fixing?

The extent of angleAxis with boundaryGap: false should only be adjusted if it has the potential to overlap, that is to say, startAngle: 90, endAngle: -90 should still get half a circle:

image

while startAngle: 90, endAngle: -270 should get 3/4 of a circle:

image

Please also not that if the range of startAngle and endAngle itself is over 360 degrees, it won't adjust to be smaller than a circle because it is not expected to.

image

Document Info

One of the following should be checked.

  • This PR doesn't relate to document changes
  • The document should be updated later
  • The document changes have been made in apache/echarts-doc#xxx

Misc

ZRender Changes

  • This PR depends on ZRender changes (ecomfe/zrender#xxx).

Related test cases or examples to use the new APIs

I added a test case under test/bar-polar-basic-radial.html.

I've run with npm run test:visual and it passes all but the above case.

Others

Merging options

  • Please squash the commits into a single one when merging.

Other information

Copy link

echarts-bot bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Thanks for your contribution!
The community will review it ASAP. In the meanwhile, please checkout the coding standard and Wiki about How to make a pull request.

The pull request is marked to be PR: author is committer because you are a committer of this project.

@Ovilia Ovilia added this to the 5.5.2 milestone Jul 22, 2024
@@ -102,9 +102,15 @@ function updatePolarScale(this: Polar, ecModel: GlobalModel, api: ExtensionAPI)
// Fix extent of category angle axis
if (angleAxis.type === 'category' && !angleAxis.onBand) {
const extent = angleAxis.getExtent();
const diff = 360 / (angleAxis.scale as OrdinalScale).count();
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can see that the old code takes 360 as the range of endAngle to startAngle, which is not always the case.

Copy link
Contributor

The changes brought by this PR can be previewed at: https://echarts.apache.org/examples/editor?version=PR-20184@c36098a

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Splitlines not appear when boundaryGap is set to false
1 participant